#Usability

I have committed the changes to fix the MR, now the failing tests are fixed. Please check

Adding the "Drupal CMS release target" to see if we could hopefully get to it.

Adding the "Drupal CMS release target" to see if we could hopefully get to it.

Meeting on 25 November 16:30 GMT. Attended by @emma-horrell @rkoller and @dead_arm

Notes here: Drupalisms meeting progress log

Summary:

• Consolidated list of those who completed the quiz is complete - Ralf to pass to Benji to ask to issue bulk credits
• Quiz now closed - work to be done cleaning data - removing duplicate entries, ensuring native languages are in a consistent style - Emma and Ralf to work on this
• Emma and Ralf to add comments to Megh's document mapping out structure of issues and child issues
• Need to log terminology decisions for Drupal CMS - plan to add a tab to the existing controlled vocabulary spreadsheet
• Emma to suggest time to continue foraging with Ralf
• Emma to circulate Doodle poll for next meeting in the week beginning 16 December

Left the comment: #3169876-33: Better handling of timezones for relative default date + times →

Since we removed all code with navigation toolbar will have to see how 📌 Integrate with navigation top bar Postponed shakes out.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Is it the case that admin_toolbar_links_access_filter module is no longer needed as-of Drupal 11.0? Or can it be removed earlier?

benjifisher → credited aaronmchale → .

benjifisher → credited rkoller → .

benjifisher → credited simohell → .

Is #18 a reliable check? That is, is it the case that if disabling the module and exporting config results in no changes, then it is safe to leave the module disabled?

This is the latest look of the card.

Rerolled the above patch for 10.3.10

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Unfortunately in #227 ✨ Drastically improve the linking experience in CKEditor 5 Needs work the merge request is closed.
I can't reopen it in https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/merge_requests/10361. Maybe someone with some extra permissions?

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Rebased against latest head and moved changes oops hook files

catch → changed the visibility of the branch drupal_3317769-drupal-3317769-11.x to hidden.

catch → changed the visibility of the branch 3317769-link-suggestions-minimum-2 to active.

catch → changed the visibility of the branch 3317769-link-suggestions-minimum to hidden.

catch → changed the visibility of the branch 3317769-cke5-entity-link-suggestions-11.x to hidden.

catch → changed the visibility of the branch drupal-3317769-11.x to hidden.

catch → changed the visibility of the branch 3317769-link-suggestions-minimum-2 to hidden.

https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/merge_requests/10036 is the merge request to be working from here, it is already against 11.x and just needs a rebase. I'm going to hide all the other branches here now.

There hasn't been any discussion here for 4 years so perhaps this is no longer a problem?

This does need steps to reproduce, so tagging. Since we need more information to move forward with this issue, I am setting the status to Postponed (maintainer needs more info). If we don't receive additional information to help with the issue, it may be closed after three months.

Thanks!

@smustgrave I have created a merge request for 11.x compatibility (MR10351), please check. There is a JSLint issue reported, will check and post further updates. The additional MR created is closed.

There are @todos in the change record so tagging for an update.

I Have checked the MR and fifth select(Sort by) list style is same as other select list. and blue outline is also showing for active case same as other filters.
Moving this +RTBC

ramprassad → closed merge request !10361

I have addressed the feedbacks regarding the color contrast.I am not sure about which checkmark icon is @rkoller talking about as this was not changed in this MR any where, it is what it was on 2.0.x.
Also the cursor: not-allowed was already added in prior commits.
@rkoller can you now verify that the changes?

Go with the list in #3, the search queries likely aren’t changing that often.

and i'll set the issue back to needs work

updating IS with remaining issues since they're hard to parse out

I just quickly wanted to chime in regarding the consent for logged in users.

ALL visitors & users must be able to consent to cookies. It has nothing to do with the fact that they are working on a company website using a company laptop, that still doesn't automatically imply that non-essential cookies can be set without permission.

So technically you would need to show the cookie consent banner on all pages, unless you aren't using non-essential cookies in the back-end or something.

would it be possible to get a recent top 100 queries list for the last month or even spanning across a longer interval so that we can then create the list of expected results? (or should be go with the list in #3)?

@ramprassad why are you opening other MRs when 10036 is pointing to the right branch? Those additional ones should be closed please

Thanks @scott_euser that is where I should have commented.

Hi @joelpittet, you can see a working example of that in the MR here: 🐛 Second level menu items can't be reached if they have children Active but that will be dropped off in favour of the 'Overview' approach which you can see the discussion there about.

I am seeing what's been reported in #12 by @anruether and echo'd by @scott_euser in #19.

Boils down to second level parents are not possible to to navigate to because the entire item is intended to toggle the children.

The primary menu item parents are possible to navigate to, though you need to click twice as they open those items. One to open the children and on the header of the children.

Proposal: split button for the arrow? I was going to give you an example of a site I did, but just saw that I broke the JS on it while I was getting the link, lol... there goes my day...