🇺🇸United States @mradcliffe

Updated issue link.

mradcliffe → created an issue. See original summary → .

Thank you everyone for participating last month! I believe I have everyone after reviewing the threads and issue.

Added relevant starter packs that I mentioned in a post.

getPropertyDefinition comes from \Drupal\Core\TypedData\ComplexDataDefinitionInterface and \Drupal\Core\TypedData\ComplexDataDefinitionBase which implements that method.

As far as I remember, all xero data type plugins should use a complex data definition, but I think that Drupal's Typed Data Manager will technically let a data type be instantiated with a different definition. My guess is that something happened during denormalization that caused the data type to be instantiated incorrectly.

Also adding a https://www.drupal.org/community/contributor-guide/find-a-task → about how to audit documentation would be nice after this. :-)

You may want to merge in origin/3.1.x after fetching from origin to allow the pipeline to run completely without having to create a new pipeline manually in the merge request.

Setting to Needs work for test failures.

Ah, yes. This makes sense based on Xero changes. Thank you.

I don't think there are any other changes necessary. Merging.

mradcliffe → made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

That'll work. Tests pass.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

Thank you for creating and submitting a merge request, @kensae.

I think the idea of allowing for case sensitivity as a setting makes sense to me. I added some comments on the merge request.

I am not sure why the job failed, but am running the pipeline on 3.1.x to see if there any pre-existing new issues that cropped up with the latest Drupal 11.2 release.

Merging. Thank you for the review @vinodhini.e and confirmation @rachel_norfolk. @ChrisDarke and I met at the new time last week as a trial.

The description field is not limited as it does not have any schema preventing it from being more than 255 characters.

The description form field causes data loss of the description field, which was probably a Drupal 7 decision based on architectural limitations of the variables system, which is no longer a problem in Drupal 8+.

I guess I could create a small glue contrib module to fix captcha, but ideally it would be nice to have the fix in this module to reduce cost of ownership / maintainership.

Needs other members to confirm.

Thank you, @vinodhini.e. Would you mind if you could share any feedback on your understanding about making the change? Were the instructions straightforward?

Should be ready for review.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

I attended the meeting.

Oh, there is no built version of the library. Yeah, that's problematic. I guess that's why there are a bunch of npm packages for various frameworks to use partytown.

I can't think of any thing good that doesn't also require a bunch of work

- gitlab job that builds and makes an extra commit.
- manually building the source and committing it based on a package.json (like a ckeditor plugin)

mradcliffe → created an issue.

The merge request applies to 2.2.x branch (2025.04.15), not to the 2.2.6 release (2024.08.09) which is several commits behind.

Focus order has its own issue 🐛 Fix keyboard accessibility of advanced attribute fields Active .

Two behavior changes:

1. When linkTitle is enabled, the CKEditor Display text field is rendered after the Advanced section. Otherwise the Display text field is rendered before the Advanced section. This is probably a side effect of fieldParent.children.add(extraFieldView, fieldParent === linkFormView ? 1 : 0). Maybe this can be fixed or addressed later if it is a problem?
2. The target decorator remains as a separate interface per CKEditor UX changes (now requires extra clicks to use).

I was not able to use FormRowView for backwards-compatibility. Instead I added a class selector to fix the styles.

Focus order still needs to be addressed. I have not been able to figure that out. Hopefully someone can update the merge request to fix focus order in a way that is backwards-compatible.

Some screenshots of old vs new:

Old

New

Merge request

Patch in #21

In order to resolve the look and feel,

the extra form fields should be added as ckeditor form rows, or maybe adding a class selector ck-form__row_large-top-padding to each extra field. The title field being outside of advanced probably just needs to become a ckeditor form row.

Then the focus order needs to be fixed.

And probably some @deprecated comments added to styles that no longer apply.

Thank you, @netsliver. Can you review the existing merge request and/or create a merge request with the source javascript changes in addition to the built javascript? It is hard to review the changes in the obfuscated built javascript.

The main changes in #21 based on an expanded diff (attached) are the following. If the _getGroup and _createExtraFormFields changes are necessary, then I think those can be applied to the merge request in source and built versions.

I think the other changes are basically equivalent to the changes in the merge request and probably has the same issues in the merge request that need to be addressed. The submit changes to check the keys may be a good thing to add as well.

•              _handleExtraFormFieldSubmit(e) {
                   const {
                       editor: t
  -                } = this, i = t.plugins.get("LinkUI").formView, r = t.commands.get("link");
  -                this.listenTo(i, "submit", (() => {
  -                    const t = e.reduce(((e, t) => (e[t] = i[t].fieldView.element.value, e)), {});
  -                    r.once("execute", ((e, i) => {
  -                        if (i.length < 3) i.push(t);
  -                        else {
  -                            if (3 !== i.length) throw Error("The link command has more than 3 arguments.");
  -                            Object.assign(i[2], t)
  -                        }
  +                } = this, r = t.plugins.get("LinkUI").formView, i = t.commands.get("link");
  +                this.listenTo(r, "submit", (() => {
  +                    const allKeys = Object.keys(s);
  +                    const t = allKeys.reduce((acc, key) => {
  +                        if (r[key] ? .fieldView ? .element ? .value != null) {
  +                            acc[key] = String(r[key].fieldView.element.value)
  +                        }
  +                        return acc
  +                    }, {});
  +                    i.once("execute", ((e, r) => {
  +                        r[1] = Object.assign({}, t, r[1] || {})
                       }), {
                           priority: "highest"
                       })
  

  _handleExtraFormFieldSubmit: only handles the new ckeditor args (not compatible with older release, so would require a version bump). It also changes the mapping of keys.

• @@ -247,22 +489,24 @@
                   const {
                       editor: e
                   } = this, t = e.plugins.get("LinkUI").formView;
  -                t.targetMoved || (t._manualDecoratorSwitches._items.forEach((e => {
  -                    e.label === Drupal.t("Open in new window") && this._getGroup("advanced").children.add(e)
  +                t.targetMoved || ((t._manualDecoratorSwitches && t._manualDecoratorSwitches._items || []).forEach((e => {
  +                    if (e.label === Drupal.t("Open in new window")) this._getGroup("advanced").children.add(e)
                   })), t.targetMoved = !0) 
               }   
  
  

  The _manualDecoratorSwitches error is resloved by checking if that exists. This is in the merge request.

•              _addGroupsToFormView() {
  @@ -228,18 +465,23 @@
                   Object.values(this.groups).reverse().forEach((e => {
                       e.added || (t.children.add(e, 2), e.parent = t, t._focusables.add(e, 2), t.focusTracker.add(e.element), e.added = !0)
                   }));
  -                [t.children.find((e => e.template.attributes.class.indexOf("ck-button-save") > -1)), t.children.find((e => e.template.attributes.class.indexOf("ck-button-cancel") > -1))].forEach(((e, i) => {
  -                    t.children.remove(e), t._focusables.remove(e), t.focusTracker.remove(e.element), t.children.add(e, 3 + i), t._focusables.add(e, 3 + i), t.focusTracker.add(e.element)
  -                }))
  +                const saveButton = t.children.find(e => e.template && e.template.attributes && e.template.attributes.class.includes("ck-button-save")),
  +                    cancelButton = t.children.find(e => e.template && e.template.attributes && e.template.attributes.class.includes("ck-button-cancel"));
  +                [saveButton, cancelButton].forEach((btn, r) => {
  +                    if (!btn) return;
  +                    t.children.remove(btn), t._focusables.remove(btn), t.focusTracker.remove(btn.element), t.children.add(btn, 3 + r), t._focusables.add(btn, 3 + r), t.focusTracker.add(btn.element)
  +                })
               }
  
  

  Changes the button finding logic in _addGroupsToFormView

•              _getGroup(e) {
                   if (!this.groups[e]) {
                       const {
                           editor: t
                       } = this, {
  -                        locale: i
  -                    } = t, r = new a.CollapsibleView(i);
  -                    r.label = n[e].label, r.set("isCollapsed", !0), this.groups[e] = r
  +                        locale: r
  +                    } = t;
  +                    this.groups[e] = new m(r, {
  +                        label: n[e].label
  +                    })
                   }
                   return this.groups[e]
               } 
  

  Changes the _getGroup method logic. Is this necessary?

• @@ -210,14 +447,14 @@
               }
               _createExtraFormField(e, t) {
                   const {
  -                    editor: i
  +                    editor: r
                   } = this, {
  -                    locale: r
  -                } = i, o = i.plugins.get("LinkUI").formView, n = i.commands.get("link");
  -                if (void 0 === o[e]) {
  -                    const i = t.group ? this._getGroup(t.group) : o,
  -                        s = new a.LabeledFieldView(r, a.createLabeledInputText);
  -                    s.label = t.label, i.children.add(s, i === o ? 1 : 0), t.group || (o._focusables.add(s, 1), o.focusTracker.add(s.element)), o[e] = s, o[e].fieldView.bind("value").to(n, e), o[e].fieldView.element.value = n[e] || ""
  +                    locale: i
  +                } = r, s = r.plugins.get("LinkUI").formView, n = r.commands.get("link");
  +                if (void 0 === s[e]) {
  +                    const r = t.group ? this._getGroup(t.group) : s,
  +                        o = new a.LabeledFieldView(i, a.createLabeledInputText);
  +                    o.label = t.label, r.children.add(o, 1), t.group || (s._focusables.add(o, 1), s.focusTracker.add(o.element)), s[e] = o, s[e].fieldView.bind("value").to(n, e), s[e].fieldView.element.value = n[e] || ""
                   }
               }
  

  There's a change when adding children in _createExtraFormFields that removes a condition. Not sure why.

• At the beginning of the file there's some webpack changes. But this may be due to yarn / npm changes that make me think there is an extra build process involved in the patch in #21 not present in the built javascript on drupal.org.

Merged

I added the Needs issue summary update tag so that scope of the issue from #34 as well as site owner workarounds can be added to the issue summary.

There's a start that gets things mostly functional again.

Okay, I understand the change in linkit @mark_fullmer mentioned a bit more now, which is necessary for saving the form values. The button and target changes would also need to be made to get things functional.

As far as I can tell, I don't think the linkit change would apply here.

I think the entire formView changes need to be redone to comply with link properties/decorators.

But then _manualDecoratorSwitches is undefined later on. Whatever that means.

The buttons are not direct children of linkFormView, but seem to be one level deeper.

.ck-form__row_with-submit button.ck-button-action which is used for Update and Insert button labels.

ck-button-save and ck-button-cancel classes were removed in CKEditor 45 as part of 17230: Improved linking experience.

So adding another item to that array maybe?

    const buttons = [
      linkFormView.children.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-button-save') > -1),
      linkFormView.children.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-button-cancel') > -1),
      linkFormView.children.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-form__row-with-submit') > -1)
         ?.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-button-action') > -1),
    ].filter(item => undefined !== item);

That's looking kind of ugly, so maybe cleaning it up so it's not in the array instantiation?

I am only using Editor Advanced Link and run into this issue on 11.2.0.

    const buttons = [
      linkFormView.children.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-button-save') > -1),
      linkFormView.children.find((child) => child.template.attributes.class.indexOf('ck-button-cancel') > -1),
    ];
    buttons.forEach((item, i) => {

The buttons here are now an array of undefined so potentially ck-button-save and ck-button-cancel no longer are found at that point in time.

I don't know if adding buttons.filter(e => undefined !== e).forEach would simply mask the issue.

Oh wait, sorry, I was on the wrong issue.

This seems like a duplicate of 🐛 D11.2: Uncaught CKEditorError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'viewUid') Active

mradcliffe → created an issue.

Thank you for reporting the issue and creating the merge request.

I started reviewing and testing this locally yesterday, and it does seem to resolve the issue. I am curious why the fee is being added per line item when it displays as if it were an order adjustment, but if that's how commerce_fee works, then it does need to be added in the place we're adding it.

I'll try to finish my review and manual testing soon.

This is what I run into with my comment in #8. If you don't want to edit composer.json, then

On a platform that meets the requirements,

composer require drupal/core-recommended:^11.2 drupal/core-composer-scaffold:^11.2 drupal/core-project-message:^11.2 --no-update
composer require --dev drupal/core-dev:^11 --no-update
rm composer.lock
composer install

Or if you prefer pinned versions in composer.json for less risk (this is what I did yesterday and it updated fine),

composer require drupal/core-recommended:11.2.0 drupal/core-composer-scaffold:11.2.0 drupal/core-project-message:11.2.0 --no-update
composer require --dev drupal/core-dev:^11 --no-update
rm composer.lock
composer install

Or if you want to use the composer.json you have above without running commands, change drupal/core-dev: 11.1.1 to drupal/core-dev: ^11, remove composer.lock, and run composer install.

I was able to update to 11.2.0 from 11.1.8 yesterday, but ran into issues along the way because of my drupal/core-dev dev dependency being too strict (^11.1 rather than ^11).

Reviewing my shell history locally, I worked around the issue using --no-update with the require commands, removed the lock file, and then ran composer install again.

@johnwt, I don' find phpunit/phpunit in that composer.json. Maybe there is a mismatch between composer.json and composer.lock on your site? Or is that not the root composer.json for your site?

Merging this so we can have GitLab pages started.

I added unique speaker notes from the current canonical slides as well as from @ninelivesblackcat's midcamp slides into the deck.

I also added her Drupal Forge slide.

I applied the theme to the FTCWS Themed slide deck in the Mentoring drive and fixed everything up so that existing content fit into placeholder content (with the exception of event logos). Some of the screenshot content is never going to be perfect for a theme due to how stylized the original image crop/masks were.

I also added the instructional slides back because these are really important for new presenters.

I added a functional test to demonstrate the error. This passes with the current approach, but the current approach cannot be used because it breaks other metatag functionality.

I updated the issue summary and removed the Needs tests and Needs issue summary update tags.

I forgot to set this to Needs review.

I think this is working now.

I added a How-to audit section to the issue summary, but it Needs work for some of us that may not understand the audit process for documentation.

Removed mentor ribbon that we used in Drupal Europe and were potentially going to continue using in lieu of t-shirts, but we ended up continuing to use shirts to identify mentors at all DrupalCon events.

@xjm reminded us of mentoring resources and links from drupalmentoring.org . And I was thinking about a bibliography that I have been collecting of recent research in first time contribution.

Adding a couple more custom named layouts would make it easier. I came up with the following and exported from Google slides (Format is pptx), and the next step is to import into the slide deck, apply a layout to a slide, consolidate the text because the existing slide decks do not use standard layout placeholders.

I had to tarball the pptx file in order to be able to upload it. So it needs a tar zxf Drupal-Mentoring.pptx.tar.gz in order to extract the Drupal-Mentoring.pptx. trying to File > Download the theme as ODP format failed for me on the slide deck.

I think I can condense most of the Title (left-aligned) slide styles into "Title and two-columns" and "Title and body" (or "One column text") by having optional Sub-title and making the flair images consistent. That might also solve the "Picture with Caption" slides.

Then maybe we have a custom layout for "Title and three-columns".

Unused: Big number, Section header

Some feedback on the branded slide deck that Chris is working on.

I looked at the standard layouts provided by themes in Google slides. And then went through each of the slides in the deck to document them, their use, and whether they could be mapped to a standard layout.

It seems to me there are too many variations at the moment and that's not including the random flair.

Also adding the Event logo on nearly every slide will make it harder to update for a speaker giving the session at an event.

Theme standard layouts

• Title Slide
• Section header
• Title and body
• Title and two-columns
• Title only
• One column text
• Main point
• Section title and description
• Caption
• Big number
• Blank

New Branding slide styles

An urgent opportunity came up the other day for the Drupal Contribution Day Japan, which is a precursor event for DrupalCon Nara 2025. To try to meet this deadline, Chris and I are going to collaborate on getting a new canonical slide deck started with standard slide layout names so that we can create a Mentoring theme using the Barcelona 2024 design.

I created the follow-up documentation store issue and postponed it on this one.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

jdleonard → credited mradcliffe → .

I added some manual testing scenarios for xdebug 3.3+ in develop mode.

Current test failures are deprecations for

1) /builds/issue/drupal-3406985/core/lib/Drupal/Core/Test/HttpClientMiddleware/TestHttpClientMiddleware.php:52
Database commit by letting a Transaction object go out of scope is deprecated in drupal:11.3.0 and is removed from drupal:13.0.0. Commit explicitly via Transaction::commitOrRelease() instead. See https://www.drupal.org/node/3524461 →

1) /builds/issue/drupal-3406985/core/lib/Drupal/Core/Database/Transaction/TransactionManagerBase.php:364
Database commit by letting a Transaction object go out of scope is deprecated in drupal:11.3.0 and is removed from drupal:13.0.0. Commit explicitly via Transaction::commitOrRelease() instead. See https://www.drupal.org/node/3524461 →

Uploaded as a text file after parsing through Functional and FunctionalJavaScript test results. Summarized as

- locale
- config_translation
- AssetOptimizationUmamiTest
- help
- demo_umami
- core Installer tests

The issue summary could also use an issue summary update with the template to improve readability of the issue.

I resolved the coding standards issues introduced in the merge request. And then fixed the typo I made in the comment.

It seems like the merge request fails on MetatagIntegrationTest. The test goes to the login page and has the default title of "Log in | Drupal" rather than the one provided by metatag_test_integration module.

The tests did pass in 2.1.1's release so this is probably an issue with the implementation here. So the patch breaks hook_metatags_attachments_alter().

The merge request had merge conflicts. I did a rebase locally to resolve conflicts.

Oops, I sometimes forget I have dreditor still installed.

Is there also not a clone issue link in the sidebar? Or did dreditor also add that?

I moved the draft into the issue summary for better editing and fixed #6.

Adding some Nara information about committee members

Closing issue.

I added some comments in the merge request. Mainly the last commit truncated the module file so it no longer is syntactically valid i.e. it errors out.

Edit: keeping the status at Needs work. Remember also to flip the status to Needs review if you think the merge request is ready for review again.

I added review and manual testing instructions.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

Kuoni now maintains the DrupalCon EU mentor box along with mentoring banner.

There is also a community mentor supply box for other events.

Closing this old issue as fixed/resolved.

We also need to add some instruction about pasting the issue link into the mentoring team channel to ask/invite people to add to the agenda including any success stories for mentors.

We determined that we should ask Working Groups whether they want to be part of a Drupal Working Group calendar rather than the Drupal Core Calendar.

At MidCamp 2025, I asked @froboy of Event Organizers Working Group, @ultimike and @markie from Community Working Group with positive responses. I explained that the meeting events would not have any private information such as Zoom links or agenda contents. So the next step is to continue to reach out to other working groups so they bring it up for discussion at their next meeting.

Maybe the next step after that is to move this or create an issue in drupal infrastructure issue queue for calendar creation with recurring meeting times/dates for all interested working groups?

Other than the dates, I copied the spreadsheet to plug in dates for Nara, and it worked well.

I guess the status should be Needs work.

mradcliffe → created an issue.

Adding meeting minutes from 2 weeks ago.

Success!

I added a custom pages job to run mkdocs and generate docs based on the mkdocs.yml file. It needed to be a custom pages job so that I could copy the calendar job artifacts into place.

The trick here is that it needs to copy the files into the docs directory somewhere, which will then get published into the public directory on build.

I had to generate an initial Gitlab pages for testing, which will be wiped out on the first build / merge, but it is available here: https://project.pages.drupalcode.org/mentoring/

I added issue links to the documentation issues as we're not ready to do anything more with GitLab pages.

I added some details about the information we collected on the spreadsheets of Awesomeness and about what we need to communicate.

I reviewed the merge request, which has the logo. The file size looks like it is about as optimized as it can get and is not too big.

jdleonard → credited mradcliffe → .

jdleonard → credited mradcliffe → .

I briefly read over the issue at MidCamp.

It seems like the proposed resolution is in the steps to reproduce? Maybe providing a clearer steps to reproduce and have someone replicate this on a fresh install would help.

Fixing tag. We'll just use one tag.