- Issue created by @benjifisher
- 🇩🇪Germany rkoller Nürnberg, Germany
This week, instead of discussing a particular issue, we have taken a general look at the skipto module. I wanted to get some feedback about its general direction. After there is no issue to comment on I use the comment here to provide a summary. These are the three issues that got created:
✨ Make the skipTo module configurable on a per user basis Active
📌 Add a percentage suffix to the position option Active
📌 Remove main-only option from heading checkbox list and add radio buttons instead ActiveThe other detail about making
divandnavlower case will be covered in the already existing 🐛 Improve the microcopy on the settings page Active . The rest of the raised issues will get issues upstream at https://github.com/skipto-landmarks-headings/page-script-5 :- If the focus is moved from the last available heading to the about skipto.js the focus outline remains on the last heading
- the form of the landmark regions is hard to read due to the front loading of the landmark type and its potentially redundant nature - several landmark regions starting with for example
Navigation:in a row - the indendation based on the heading level makes the heading list very hard to read - and the heading level is already communicated by the number
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.