Discourage use of Stark as a base theme (and possibly mark it internal or hidden)

Created on 21 February 2017, almost 8 years ago
Updated 19 March 2023, almost 2 years ago

Stable and Stark at this point are quite similar. However, Stark is using core templates, which may well change over time, potentially breaking subthemes. Stable has duplicated the core templates which will remain consistent throughout the D8 lifecycle. Unlike in D7, there is never a reason to use Stark as a basetheme. Why is it listed on the Appearance page? And worse, why are users prompted to "Learn how to build a custom theme from Stark..."?

I recommend removing Stark from the /appearance page or at least modifying the help text to express Stable or Classy are better options:

Stark
Intended as a testing platform to view default markup. This should never be subthemed as future core updates may break your theme. Instead, core supplies Classy and Stable which are better options. Numerous contributed base themes exist, as well. Learn how to build a custom themes in the Theming Guide.

Thoughts?

📌 Task
Status

Needs work

Version

10.1

Component
Stark 

Last updated 11 months ago

Created by

🇺🇸United States NonProfit

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
  • Needs subsystem maintainer review

    It is used to alert the maintainer(s) of a particular core subsystem that an issue significantly impacts their subsystem, and their signoff is needed (see the governance policy draft for more information). Also, if you use this tag, make sure the issue component is set to the correct subsystem. If an issue significantly impacts more than one subsystem, use needs framework manager review instead.

  • Novice

    It would make a good project for someone who is new to the Drupal contribution process. It's preferred over Newbie.

Missing content requested by

🇦🇺Australia dpi
about 1 year ago
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Production build 0.71.5 2024