ConfigFormBase::typedConfigManager() should have been removed when deprecations were removed in 11.0

Created on 29 September 2024, 25 days ago

Problem/Motivation

Some deprecation handling code was added in 🐛 [regression] The new property \Drupal\Core\Form\ConfigFormBase::$typedConfigManager conflicts with some contrib modules Fixed for the $this->typedConfigManager class property. This added among other things:

+  protected function typedConfigManager(): TypedConfigManagerInterface {

The $this->typedConfigManager constructor parameter no longer has deprecation handling, so this method should be removed too.

Steps to reproduce

Proposed resolution

Remaining tasks

User interface changes

Introduced terminology

API changes

Data model changes

Release notes snippet

📌 Task
Status

Active

Version

11.0 🔥

Component

forms system

Created by

🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
  • Novice

    It would make a good project for someone who is new to the Drupal contribution process. It's preferred over Newbie.

Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @joachim
  • 🇮🇳India annmarysruthy

    Deprecation code was added in https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/3394197 🐛 [regression] The new property \Drupal\Core\Form\ConfigFormBase::$typedConfigManager conflicts with some contrib modules Fixed and later it was removed in https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/3443488 📌 Remove deprecated code from lib/Flood and lib/Form Fixed

  • 🇨🇦Canada ksere Montreal

    Was just checking the code in the ConfigFormBase class and was wondering if it's safe to fully remove the method?

    /**
       * Returns the typed config manager service.
       *
       * @return \Drupal\Core\Config\TypedConfigManagerInterface
       *   The typed config manager service.
       */
      protected function typedConfigManager(): TypedConfigManagerInterface {
        if ($this->typedConfigManager instanceof TypedConfigManagerInterface) {
          return $this->typedConfigManager;
        }
        return \Drupal::service('config.typed');
      }

    Would it be safer to keep to just remove the condition and turn it into a getter to avoid breaking contrib or custom modules that could be using it? Like so:

    /**
       * Returns the typed config manager service.
       *
       * @return \Drupal\Core\Config\TypedConfigManagerInterface
       *   The typed config manager service.
       */
      protected function typedConfigManager(): TypedConfigManagerInterface {
        return $this->typedConfigManager;
      }

    Just want to make sure!

  • First commit to issue fork.
  • 🇮🇳India mdsohaib4242

    It would be safer to keep the method and just remove the condition, turning it into a getter. This way, you avoid the risk of breaking contrib or custom modules that might rely on it. By keeping it as a getter, you ensure backward compatibility.

    /**
     * Returns the typed config manager service.
     *
     * @return \Drupal\Core\Config\TypedConfigManagerInterface
     *   The typed config manager service.
     */
    protected function typedConfigManager(): TypedConfigManagerInterface {
      return $this->typedConfigManager;
    }
    

    This will make sure your modules continue to work seamlessly without any unexpected breaks. Does this give you a bit more confidence in your change?

  • 🇬🇧United Kingdom joachim

    The typedConfigManager() was only added for deprecation handling, when the TypedConfigManager was added to the constructor.

    There's no need for it to exist in the long term.

  • @ankitv18 opened merge request.
  • First commit to issue fork.
  • 🇫🇷France andypost

    Fix looks good, pipeline needs to re-queue failed job

  • 🇮🇳India ankitv18

    I thought faux commit would do the magic after learning about composer 2.8.1 issues failing tests.
    Tests are still failing which is quite unfamiliar to me

    Time: 00:08.303, Memory: 8.00 MB
        
        There was 1 error:
        
        1)
        Drupal\Tests\Composer\Plugin\Scaffold\Functional\ComposerHookTest::testComposerHooks
        RuntimeException: Exit code: 1
        
        Creating a "fixtures/drupal-drupal" project at "./create-project-test"
        Installing fixtures/drupal-drupal (1.0.0)
    

    Any idea? @andypost

  • 🇮🇳India ankitv18

    Now pipelines are passing ~~ seems some issue with gitlab CI or seems failing due to composer 2.8.1(Not sure)
    Moving into review

  • 🇺🇸United States smustgrave

    If it was missed in D11 that was definitely a mistake but think it should be deprecated properly since D11 is already out.

    Leaving novice tag.

Production build 0.71.5 2024