πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium @ant1

Account created on 26 March 2018, over 6 years ago
#

Recent comments

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

You're totally right. This patch didn't went through. Pity we cannot reinstate this issue.
Also checked patch on #15 and it does the job more cleanly than older patches.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ changed the visibility of the branch 3302284-add-possibility-to to hidden.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

#10: If multiple selections are allowed, the "Add select all/none links" checkbox does not for the Links widget.
It does show for you disable multiple selections.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

I created a initial setup for the submodule.
There is still the issue of data loss regarding this setting with the upgrade.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ changed the visibility of the branch 3361172-node-keep-can to hidden.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ changed the visibility of the branch 3345064-10.2.x to hidden.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ changed the visibility of the branch 10.2.x to hidden.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

In combination with https://www.drupal.org/project/entity_reference_revisions/issues/3150084 πŸ› Non-translatable fields can only be changed when updating the current revision. Needs review , the issue in #15 should be partly solved.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

This testmodule doesn't exist anymore.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

MR !13 seems to fix this issue. Bumped to RTBC for visibility.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Looks good! Thanks for the fast follow-up.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Had to do with the request of our client. They need to receive this data in my suggested format.
I don't mind creating a local patch just for our use-case; I follow the preference of the majority.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

#45 still works in Drupal 10.1.4.
I will not change the Status, as I don't know if it has been rebased / retargeted.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

I know it is a hacky method, but it does the job for the moment.

By the way, I was looking at the getCssClassName function.
This is a very unreliable method to create classes, as it changes dependending on the amount of instances and position.
I know it is to be sure no style is overridden, but as a front-end developer you are nothing with the 'class' option.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Maybe drop the versioning of LP?
The composer should handle the requirement then.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

I can agree on that. The intention was to, at least, make the site builder aware.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Applied feedback from #9.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Feedback from #6 has been applied. Thanks for reviewing it.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

#4: With this patch, it should not be needed as it is done automatticaly.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

Following feedback from #5:

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ created an issue.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

ant1 β†’ created an issue.

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium ant1

antoineh β†’ created an issue.

Production build 0.71.5 2024