🇵🇹Portugal @joaomarques736

Account created on 29 December 2017, almost 7 years ago
#

Recent comments

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello geoffreyr,

I added a new field (Success value comparison) that can be used to put the value that the response field must have to return success, hope it helps.

Best regards!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi depsumd,

Regarding the endpoint, it is possible to use drupal tokens in the endpoint field. You can create your custom token to get the appropriate base domain URL, and add the token to the endpoint field.
For the credentials, we don't have any plan currently to change the behaviour, please feel free to provide a patch with that functionality if you need, reopen this issue with the patch and then we can add to the module.

Best regards and thanks for your contact!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

It is already fixed in the new release 3.0.6.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

It is already fixed in the new release 3.0.6.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello robert weinstein,

What happens if you go to this URL: "/admin/config/webform_content_creator"?

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello NicholasS,

Thank you for reporting this and for the merge request. It is already merged into 4.x branch and it will go in the next release.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello Kolin, Thanks for you suggestion.
It is already deployed in the most recent version.
Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello Kolin, Thanks for you suggestion.
It is already deployed in the most recent version.
Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

It is already fixed in 3.x branch and it will be deployed in the next release, thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello freelock, thanks for your contribution. It is already merged in the branch 3.x, thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

It is already merged in 3.x branch and it will be deployed in the next release.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

It is already merged in 3.x branch and it will be deployed in the next release.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello Galamba,

Thanks for your patch, it is included in the new release. Many thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello CodeWilliamson,

Right now, we have no plans to work on this feature.

Would it be possible for you to provide a patch supporting this functionality?

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello NicholasS,

Many thanks for your support. I will merge these changes in the new release: 4.0.9.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi all,

This plugin is working with other countries, so this seems to be a particular case and it can't be incorporated in the module.
Only the fix for the warning "Undefined array key 0" ( https://www.drupal.org/project/webform_content_creator/issues/3405040#co... 🐛 Address field mapping errors Closed: works as designed ) is deployed in the new release. (4.0.8)

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello whereiam,

It is already fixed in 4.x dev branch and it will be added in the next release (it will be 4.0.8).

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello ecvandenberg and turtletrail,

This feature is already implemented in the most recent version.

Many thanks.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi bburch,

Indeed, pathauto module seems to override the configuration of webform content creator (wcc) module. Wcc module works properly when pathauto is not used. However, when pathauto is used, it runs after the creation of an entity with Wcc module, overriding the wcc configuration.

As the URL alias is not created only in these cases, and considering that pathauto is other contrib module, for now we will leave the functionality as is just to avoid creating so specific exceptions.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi joel_osc,

I tried to reproduce the issue without success.

However, I applied the same logic we had before to convert HTML entities (applied to the new architecture) and it should be fine right now.
Currently it is only in 4.x-dev, but it will go in the next release (4.0.7).
Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi Helianthropy,

Thanks for your help, it seems to be a good plan and it would be really appreciated if you can go ahead with it!

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hi Helianthropy,

Yes, if we have a patch it can be accepted into the project. I think it could be a new operation link in webform content creator page (like "Manage fields" and "Edit").

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello natemow, Thanks for your patch, it is already applied in DEV 4.x branch and it will go in the next release.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello zterry95, Thanks for your patch! It will go in the next release, best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello Liam Morland, Thanks for reporting this and for your patch, it will go in the next release.

Many thanks! Best regards

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello milos.kroulik, Thanks for your help, I did some adjustments and committed you changes! It will go in the next release. Best regards

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

Thanks mchamps for explaining the steps to make the synchronisation work.

Best regards!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

Considering the new plugin system, it can be extended to create the plugins for any type of complex field, including paragraphs.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

Considering the new plugin system, it can be extended to create the plugins for any type of complex field. Please feel free to provide new generic plugin for the common used fields, creating new issues with the patches for each field.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello all,

As we have the alternative solution with content moderation, this functionality won't be in scope for this module in the near future.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello joel_osc,

This is implemented in the new version 4.0.5.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello hktang,

This is fixed in the new version 4.0.5.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello sdsc, Hope you are well.

The module provides a plugin system that can be extended to work properly with complex fields, like those with different text formats. The best way to make it work is to extend this plugin system and create a plugin that fulfils the website requirements. If the plugin is generic enough, it can be incorporated on this module but it is out of scope at the moment.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello jess39, Thanks for your request! We already have other issues asking to have the creation of nested content entities (like paragraphs). e.g: https://www.drupal.org/project/webform_content_creator/issues/3318873 Any way / plans to create nested entities / content Active . In this issue, it is proposed a solution that can provide the functionality you need, extending the webform content creator module with custom plugins. Hope it can help!

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello nigelheinsius, Thanks for your request.

Unfortunately, I think it would not be possible to integrate directly the functionality of this module with webform emails. The only possible solution would be to send email on content entity creation (using other module or solution to send e-mails on content entities creation).

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello ahaomar, Thank you for your request.

To make advanced mapping (like the one you suggest), you need to create a new plugin of type "WebformContentCreator" in a custom module to achieve that mapping. You have some examples of these plugins already implemented in this module.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello Picanha, Thanks for your request. Could you provide more details on the mapping ? Please notice that the content entity id (nid,tid,uid, etc..) can't be the same for different entities,so in the mapping the entity id can't be static or be mapped with some field that can be duplicated. Otherwise the module will throw an exception while trying to create the content, some custom handler or additional module should be used to do that validation, however this module is working as designed.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello braintec, Thanks for your request.

Currently this module is working as designed and we don't have in mind any change regarding this for the near future. If you wish, you can reopen this ticket and provide a patch that implements the required functionality.

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello, it is fixed in the new release.

Thanks!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello abdulFarooqui and angelamnr,

The patch is already applied in the new version (4.0.4). Thanks.

Best regards!

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello jeroenbegyn,

Thank you for your patch. It is already applied in 2.0.x branch (2.0.3).

Best regards.

🇵🇹Portugal joaomarques736

Hello BetoAveiga and qpro,

Could you please provide more details (yml configurations for testing would be helpful) in order to reproduce this error?

Thanks!

Production build 0.71.5 2024