- 🇮🇳India gauravvvv Delhi, India
Patch #12, no longer applies to 10.1.x. I have re-rolled the patch. Along with that instead of
margin-right
I have usedmargin-inline-end
so we don't need to write it again for RTL. Please review. - Status changed to Needs work
almost 2 years ago 11:17am 10 February 2023 The Needs Review Queue Bot → tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".
Apart from a re-roll or rebase, this issue may need more work to address feedback in the issue or MR comments. To progress an issue, incorporate this feedback as part of the process of updating the issue. This helps other contributors to know what is outstanding.
Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide → to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.
- Status changed to Needs review
almost 2 years ago 11:34am 10 February 2023 - 🇫🇷France nod_ Lille
Issue version was not updated. Bot checked against wrong branch.
- 🇮🇳India DeepaliJ
Able to reproduce the issue using steps in IS
Verified and tested patch #16 on Drupal 10.1.x-dev
The patch applied cleanly
The issue got resolved after applying the patch. Now, the white line doesn't appear when the font size is reduced
Refer to the attached screenshotsBefore:
After:
RTBC +1
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
For me this is a won't fix because this is a button + dropdown. That little space provides some separation but without it the two blend together.
Will post in #frontend
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 11:42pm 22 February 2023 - 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
Yeah, I think removing the vertical line is out of scope.
The issue summary is about removing the bottom line.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 9:57am 28 March 2023 - 🇮🇳India TanujJain-TJ
Cannot reproduce this issue on Drupal: 10.1.x, tried it on different browsers and with different font sizes. Attaching screenshots for reference.
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 4:02pm 28 March 2023 - Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 3:18am 29 March 2023 - 🇮🇳India gauravvvv Delhi, India
Addressed #21, attached interdiff with #16.
#22, introduced a new solution, that is not aligned with the earlier ones.
- 🇮🇳India Akshay kashyap
@Gauravvvv Thanks for the Patch. I tested Patch #27 and it is working fine. Please find the attached image for the results.
Thank You!!
- Status changed to RTBC
over 1 year ago 12:34pm 30 March 2023 - 🇮🇳India Aziza Anwari Gujarat
Checked the patch given in #27 working fine as expected
The last submitted patch, 27: 3316627-27.patch, failed testing. View results →
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 2:22pm 31 March 2023 - @bnjmnm opened merge request.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 3:44pm 31 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States bnjmnm Ann Arbor, MI
I tried the various patches here and all of them had issues at certain zoom settings. MR has a solution that I believe works at all zoom settings, and a reviewer can confirm or disprove this 😎
- Status changed to RTBC
over 1 year ago 5:21pm 31 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Tested the MR3768 and did not see any issue when zooming in and out. Used chrome for testing.
- 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
Crediting @smustgrave for changing the course of the issue and @Asha Nair for the first screenshots
- 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
Manually tested this and confirmed the white box at the bottom is gone.
Crediting joachim for reporting.
-
larowlan →
committed fdebc9a9 on 10.0.x
Issue #3316627 by bnjmnm, Gauravvvv, Sakthivel M, Akshay kashyap, Asha...
-
larowlan →
committed fdebc9a9 on 10.0.x
-
larowlan →
committed 58f00eff on 10.1.x
Issue #3316627 by bnjmnm, Gauravvvv, Sakthivel M, Akshay kashyap, Asha...
-
larowlan →
committed 58f00eff on 10.1.x
- 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
Committed to 10.1.x and backported to 10.0.x and 9.5.x
-
larowlan →
committed 4172f231 on 9.5.x
Issue #3316627 by bnjmnm, Gauravvvv, Sakthivel M, Akshay kashyap, Asha...
-
larowlan →
committed 4172f231 on 9.5.x
- Status changed to Fixed
over 1 year ago 8:38am 3 April 2023 - Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 9:56pm 3 April 2023 - 🇬🇧United Kingdom longwave UK
Reverting this from 9.5.x, while this cherry-picked cleanly,
yarn build
gives a different result:diff --git a/core/themes/claro/css/components/dropbutton.css b/core/themes/claro/css/components/dropbutton.css index fa35ce738f..15d9a3fba1 100644 --- a/core/themes/claro/css/components/dropbutton.css +++ b/core/themes/claro/css/components/dropbutton.css @@ -67,12 +67,16 @@ } .js .dropbutton-widget { - border-radius: var(--button-border-radius-size); - background-color: var(--button-bg-color); + border-radius: 2px; + background-color: #d3d4d9; +} + +[dir="ltr"] .js .dropbutton-action { + border-right: 1px solid white; } -.js .dropbutton-action { - border-inline-end: var(--dropbutton-border-size) solid white; +[dir="rtl"] .js .dropbutton-action { + border-left: 1px solid white; } /* Variants. */
This is presumably because we can't use CSS variables on IE11 in 9.5.x, and so PostCSS builds the resulting CSS differently.
-
longwave →
committed afb24c3d on 9.5.x
Revert "Issue #3316627 by bnjmnm, Gauravvvv, Sakthivel M, Akshay kashyap...
-
longwave →
committed afb24c3d on 9.5.x
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 10:05pm 3 April 2023 - Status changed to RTBC
over 1 year ago 11:55pm 3 April 2023 -
larowlan →
committed a0280e64 on 9.5.x
Issue #3316627 by bnjmnm, Gauravvvv, Sakthivel M, Akshay kashyap,...
-
larowlan →
committed a0280e64 on 9.5.x
- Status changed to Fixed
over 1 year ago 12:01am 4 April 2023 - 🇦🇺Australia larowlan 🇦🇺🏝.au GMT+10
Committed the new patch variant to 9.5.x
Lessons learned - 'css only changes' still need testing on lower versions before backport 😀
Thanks @longwave
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.
- Status changed to Fixed
over 1 year ago 9:35pm 23 April 2023 - 🇭🇺Hungary pasqualle 🇭🇺 Budapest
The button background introduced a problem in Gin theme
🐛 Dropbutton style issue after Claro update Fixed - 🇺🇸United States Kristen Pol Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Was looking at this issue and was surprised that the person who created the issue was not given issue credit... I thought we always give issue credit to the issue creator? In fact, I don't know why that wouldn't just default to being checked. Also, Deepali looks to have genuinely tested a patch that had not been tested yet didn't get credit so I'm unclear on that as well. But since this is marked closed, I don't know if it will be changed.