- 🇮🇳India pooja saraah Chennai
Fixed failed commands on #120
Attached patch against Drupal 10.1.x - Status changed to Needs review
almost 2 years ago 6:09pm 25 January 2023 - Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 7:59am 23 February 2023 - 🇳🇱Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam
Still needs test coverage for the Views UI working.
-
+++ b/core/modules/views/tests/src/Functional/Plugin/StyleTableTest.php @@ -242,6 +242,24 @@ public function testGrouping() { + $this->assertNotEmpty($this->cssSelect('tbody th[scope="row"]'));
This is still too minimal, we should actually check what is in it
-
+++ b/core/themes/olivero/templates/views/views-view-table.html.twig index a26eaeba85..a212ef8dcc 100644 --- a/core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-table.html.twig --- a/core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-table.html.twig +++ b/core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-table.html.twig
I don't think we can change these here templates since they are 'stable'
And looking at this again, we should add an upgrade path to set the default value for existing Views so people don't get unrelated changes later when they change a View
-
- 🇺🇸United States theMusician
Thank you for the feedback Lendude. Items 1 and 2 I believe I have knowledge of how to address moving forward.
Regarding an upgrade path for existing views, in the proposed patch this is set in Views/Style/Table.php,
$options['row_header'] = ['default' => ' '];
For existing views, where would I look to provide an upgrade path? In local testing, existing views seem to show the new row header option but not have it selected. I am guessing I am missing something obvious.
I appreciate any guidance you can offer.
Thank you
- 🇺🇸United States theMusician
A new patch that does a more robust check for scope=row on output.
Removal of changes to stable9.
Thank you @CarlyGerard and @packern for team programming on this patch.
- last update
over 1 year ago Custom Commands Failed - 🇺🇸United States theMusician
Missed the code formatting fixes. Trying again.
- last update
over 1 year ago 29,379 pass - Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 5:05pm 12 May 2023 - 🇺🇸United States theMusician
I believe the new patch satisfies the concerns raised earlier in the discussion.
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 9:15pm 12 May 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Cleaned up the tags some.
Seems #124 still needs to be addressed.
For the upgrade path it will, I believe,
1. need to load all views
2. Check if they are using table
3. Add this setting even if it's uncheckedIdea being if this patch is applied and I open a view with a table. If I make 0 changes and click save and configuration is shown as changed because of this new setting then that would need upgrade path.
Upgrade test can be simple
Check a view table that this setting doesn't exist
Run updates
Check setting now exists. - 🇺🇸United States CarlyGerard
Adds upgrade path test to views where if not set, set header to "none." The interdiff showed a template also removed a classy template--I think in 11.x-dev the classy files are removed, unless someone can confirm otherwise?
- last update
about 1 year ago Patch Failed to Apply - 🇺🇸United States CarlyGerard
Re-rolled patch from comment #131 ✨ Add support for tables with two headers in views table display Needs work since it couldn't apply.
- last update
about 1 year ago Custom Commands Failed - 🇺🇸United States CarlyGerard
Fixing custom commands error from ViewsConfigUpdater.php in #132 ✨ Add support for tables with two headers in views table display Needs work , where the bool value wasn't returned properly given the function parameter.
- last update
about 1 year ago 30,324 pass, 62 fail - 🇺🇸United States CarlyGerard
Fixes undefined array key issue flagged from ViewsConfigUpdater.php in last CI testing.
- last update
about 1 year ago Composer error. Unable to continue. - last update
about 1 year ago 30,487 pass - Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 9:28pm 3 November 2023 - 🇺🇸United States theMusician
Hooray. Passing tests again and they are more comprehensive. I believe this checks all the tests described in comment #129.
- 🇺🇸United States theMusician
The change record has been updated to reflect the current passing patch.
https://www.drupal.org/node/3263530 → - Status changed to Needs work
12 months ago 7:51am 7 December 2023 - 🇳🇱Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam
+++ b/core/modules/views/views.post_update.php @@ -137,3 +137,14 @@ function views_post_update_taxonomy_filter_user_context(?array &$sandbox = NULL) + return $view_config_updater->setRowHeaderOption($view);
This should follow the pattern of 'needsABC' and further changes to ConfigEntityUpdater so it will also update newly imported config when installing a module like we do in other Views updates.
Also we need a test for the upgrade path to make sure it actually works
- 🇺🇸United States theMusician
As always, thank you for the feedback and guidance.
On my dev instance, there is an upgrade test in theory that operates but I can't get views actually to run an update hook.
A new file in tests/fixtures/update exists called set_row_header_option.php
It looks like
/** * @file * Test fixture. */ use Drupal\Core\Database\Database; use Drupal\Core\Serialization\Yaml; $connection = Database::getConnection(); $connection->insert('config') ->fields([ 'collection' => '', 'name' => 'views.view.test_set_row_header_option', 'data' => serialize(Yaml::decode(file_get_contents('core/modules/views/tests/fixtures/update/views.view.test_set_row_header_option.yml'))), ]) ->execute();
and then in tests/src/Functional/Update/ViewsSetRowHeaderUpdateTest.php I try to run the test which includes firing the updates using runUpdates(); which as I understand it runs update hooks. It is modeled after ViewsFixRevisionUpdateTest.php in the same directory.
/** * Tests the upgrade path for adding row header option. */ public function testViewsPostUpdateSetRowHeaderOption() { $view = View::load('test_set_row_header_option'); $data = $view->toArray(); // Assert no row header exists $this->assertArrayNotHasKey('row_header', $data['display']['default']['display_options']['style']['options']); $this->runUpdates(); $view = View::load('test_set_row_header_option'); $data = $view->toArray(); // Assert row header option exists, return values $this->assertArrayHasKey('row_header', $data['display']['default']['display_options']['style']['options']); }
which I think means the update hook needs to be in views.install. I have tried various iterations but when runUpdates() executes it doesn't apply any changes. Is there a different spot that updates go to when running tests? I can't find any views updates that would correspond to the other tests in /Tests/Src/Functional/Update.
I don't get any errors in the tests except that after running the updates, the new key cannot be found which tells me the hook_update I added into views.install is not running properly. If I introduce a syntax error into the hook_update, the test will fail and point out the syntax error, so it does seem like it wants the code to be in that spot.
Thank you for any hints.
- 🇺🇸United States theMusician
I believe the code for ViewsConfigUpdater needs to be called https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/blob/96d21a4603df23080a34051... in updateAll of viewsConfigUpdater for the test runUpdates() function to work.