Thanks for fixing so quickly.
This issue is still creating confusion for members of our local communities. I've even seen media partners do posts about events on social promoting the wrong times because of it. Would love to see it fixed or some kind of simple workaround, like hiding the wrong time field and displaying another.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
The very first reported feedback comment was about the overall scale. Some improvements were made there, but it still feels large and cartoonish to me. The use of so many color blocks with tertiary colors may contribute to that. It does not instill confidence in the platform. There are some places where a single sentence takes up the entire screen as you scroll (for example on drupal-cms and about/overview/technical). I think further adjustments to design scale and text size would improve readability and convey the "powerful" and "secure" brand attributes.
I also find the new navigation overwhelming. Seven site sections each with multiple pages below them with both page titles and descriptions. It is a lot to process. It would be nice if the seven major sections could be organized into fewer. There does seem overlap between Develop and Download, and it's confusing that there is the word Support twice with different purposes. I realize DA wants to attract members and donations, but that is not going to be the primary focus for most users coming to the site. I am not sure it justifies a whole separate item on the main nav.
Eliminating the text descriptions under the menu items would go a long ways toward cleaning it up. With good menu labels the items should stand on their own. It adds visual clutter and cognitive load having a description under each item. In most cases, I don't think the descriptions add any helpful information that a user wouldn't intuit from the title. I guess this is the debate about the usability of mega menus, whether they are truly more user-friendly than a streamlined dropdown menu.
Posting the latest diff as a patch.
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
I am trying to make the cancel button visible at all times, so that it is easy for users to click. I have this in the code and I see it is being added to the form, but it still shows in the dropdown and not as a separate button:
// Move cancel to be a gin action item.
if (isset($form['actions']['cancel'])) {
$form['actions']['cancel']['#gin_action_item'] = TRUE;
}
I attempted to rebase the MR and resolve the conflict, but I'm not sure if I did it correctly. Here is a patch with the latest changes.
heatherwoz → made their first commit to this issue’s fork.
I applied this patch but the #gin_action_item flag isn't working for me. The Preview button is hidden now as expected.
mandclu → credited heatherwoz → .
Keeping this one open. I still have some reimbursements/stipends to issue and final reporting.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
liberatr → credited heatherwoz → .
heatherwoz → created an issue.
I do not think we should add an "other" category. It is literally "othering." Ever since I've started thinking about inclusive language, I've tried to avoid that term in option lists. In terms of usability, it would make the list of options longer without adding much value. It might not be used very often, and users have no idea what to expect when they select it. And regarding content quality, it might invite other kinds of random events. It would need to be more descriptive than "other" to be useful.
Maybe if we can generate a list of example events, it would help us come up with a category. What are some specific events that would be posted on the Drupal Community Events calendar that don't fall into the proposed list?
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
froboy → credited heatherwoz → .
Using it for Pacific Northwest Drupal Summit 2024: https://pnwdrupalsummit.org
I think Contribution is still a valuable category to have. Not every event has organized contribution opportunities, so it can be helpful to see all the events/places where contribution is taking place.
Closing because this discussion will be carried over in #3467917: Rethink the Event Categories →
It was also proposed to remove "DrupalFest" since that category is rarely/never used.
The Slack thread where this was briefly discussed: https://drupal.slack.com/archives/C03KZ3BETNH/p1718123531819019?thread_t...
heatherwoz → created an issue.
Event is done. Excellent job. I think you can close this.
This has been done, right?
I am not sure who to credit for doing it, but I think we can close this issue.
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
Works great, restores the icon images.
Closing in favor of 📌 Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes Fixed which has more recent changes.
heatherwoz → made their first commit to this issue’s fork.
Sent an email to project owner using the Contact form.
heatherwoz → created an issue.
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
froboy → credited heatherwoz → .
seantwalsh → credited heatherwoz → .
heatherwoz → created an issue.
DDEV is great, but the idea of a single sanctioned "official" environment is dangerous. There are lots of reasons developers and teams prefer different environments, as voiced above. Plus the landscape is constantly changing. I'd be in favor of recommending a certain environment in any Quick Start guides and demos, but leave it open so that developers don't feel like they are doing a bad thing if they choose something else. DDEV as a default environment, but not the official environment.
I have a project that still relies on this module. Would love to see an official D10 compatible release.
Also tested patch in #8 and it's working for us.
I was going to work on this too and had the same question - which module does this refer to? Marking as Postponed (needs more info)
Proposed text: "Adds a button to CKEditor toolbar so that users can easily insert anchor links (also known as jump links or shortcut links)."
It provides more than color-coding to compare differences. I'd broaden to say it provides visual comparisons, and don't need to repeat the name of the module.
"Provides a visual comparison between two content revisions, with options for what to include and how to organize the comparison display."
I like this latest version. Concise and non-technical. I often use language like this to explain caching to my clients.
hestenet → credited heatherwoz → .
hestenet → credited heatherwoz → .
@birchy82 reviewed and approved. This has been merged.
PR is ready for review: https://github.com/fourkitchens/sous-drupal-project/pull/90