undefined - Contrib.social

Comment 14 days ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hello dear Drupal.org Project Owbership Team,

I'm still interested in offering my help to maintain this project.

It would be great, if it could happen now.

Thx a lot!
Andreas

Comment 28 days ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Thx a lot Alberto, see you in 14 days :)

Comment 28 days ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Comment 28 days ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

dear Drupal.org project ownership team,

the current maintainers of this project appear all to have left, and they have not responded within 2 weeks. I contacted them multiple times via the drupal.org contact form. In order to keep the project usable, zany and myself would like to offer maintainership for this project.

The link to the project is this: https://www.drupal.org/project/views_xml_backend →

Thx a lot!
Andreas

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Alright, will do. The `Open Ownership Pledge` Tag is not required? I've read somewhere, that it should be added.

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi @avpaderno, you mean that we have to wait 2 more days before moving the issue? Or did we overlook some step in the process?

Thx a lot for a short feedback!
Andreas

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hello dear Drupal.org project ownership team,

the current maintainers of this project appear all to have left, and they have not responded within 2 weeks. I contacted them multiple times via the drupal.org contact form. In order to avoid further delays, I would like to raise my offer from co-maintain to maintain at the same time.

The link to the project is this: https://www.drupal.org/project/views_xml_backend →

If you can see, that the current maintainers have not logged in to drupal.org for a long time, I would appreaciate if you could start the process maybe now instead of waiting two more weeks?

Thx a lot!
Andreas

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

A yes, no answer whatsoever so far. I'll move this issue to the Drupal.org project ownership issue queue on friday.

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

I contacted again the whole team via the drupal contact form. @zany, if you are on facebook or twitter, maybe it is worth a shot there as well? Some of them have social links in their profile. Personally Im not on either and can not contact them there.

📌 | Views XML Backend | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Alright, I found https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/managing-a-drupalorg-theme-module-or... → and try to follow the procedure via https://www.drupal.org/project/views_xml_backend/issues/3478213 💬 Support in Maintenance Active - it wil take a month... fingers crossed, we can make it faster.

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

I contacted all current maintainers for accepting me as o-maintainer.

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

📌 | Views XML Backend | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi @bspeare, I'm not sure if I can do it, but for you I think it would be possible to get co-ownership of this module following https://www.drupal.org/node/2938367#s-how-to-apply-for-ownership-or-co-m... →

I have the feeling, that the current maintainers are not really active anymore...

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

schoenef → created an issue.

📌 | Views XML Backend | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

📌 | Views XML Backend | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

The MR (thx a lot @zany) works well for us. In my opinion it can be merged and released.

📌 | Views XML Backend | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi @bspeare, is there a way to include the whole MR as patch somehow? Then I can test it in our site.

Thx a lot!
Andreas

📌 | Webform Node Element | Automated Drupal 10 compatibility fixes

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi guys, is there any news on a proper D10 release for thi smodule?

Thx a lot!
Andreas

💬 | OAuth2 Client | How to use this module to replace the drupal login?

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Thank you! I had the feeling this was build somehow for something different then I thought. I'll try OIDC, it looks also good.

I don't need to connect to something using oauth, but if I had to, I would still not know how to actually use this module in a real world example. Maybe it would help to add a simple example to the documentation?

Best wishes and thx again for the clarification!
Andreas

💬 | OAuth2 Client | How to use this module to replace the drupal login?

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

💬 | OAuth2 Client | How to use this module to replace the drupal login?

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

schoenef → created an issue.

✨ | Redirect | Allow Redirecting to another language

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

I stand corrected - it only works together with the path from #42 like I described above.

✨ | Redirect | Allow Redirecting to another language

🐛 | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Contact already in list prevent custom redirect

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

For me the patches do not work - but if I unse undefined as redirect language and don't select an actual node, but a lcoale path, it works

For example:

Path: docs/DOC-1763

To: /de/node/2

Redirects then to the correct DE url alias of the node/2

This is not a good design and totally not obvious, but I guess this could count as "work as designed".

I'd preffer a selection "Destination Language" thou, if more then one language is defined in the site.

🐛 | Permissions by Term | Taxonomy Permissions are not saved when using "Save and go to list"

Comment 2 months ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

I also had a closer look now, and it looks like this happens for multi language setups. In my case the taxonomy had as language "not applicable", so the permissions by term are stored with langcode zxx - BUT when being loaded, it takes the current language (en) - so it is not found.

extending the queries to pull also und and zxx languages might help, but I got a feeling that this would touch very much the core of this module and also potentially introduce bad side effects. However, it would be desirable to allow language independent access taxonomies for multi language sides.

I did test this in web/modules/contrib/permissions_by_term/src/Service/AccessStorage.php:

Before:

public function getRoleTermPermissionsByTid($term_id, $langcode) {
    return $this->database->select('permissions_by_term_role', 'pr')
      ->condition('tid', $term_id)
      ->condition('langcode', $langcode)
      ->fields('pr', ['rid'])
      ->execute()
      ->fetchCol();
  }

After (works as expected in the display, not tested further):

  public function getRoleTermPermissionsByTid($term_id, $langcode) {
    return $this->database->select('permissions_by_term_role', 'pr')
      ->condition('tid', $term_id)
      ->condition('langcode', [$langcode, 'und', 'zxx'], 'IN')
      ->fields('pr', ['rid'])
      ->execute()
      ->fetchCol();
  }

The language is all over, so this would definitely require thorough retesting and an architecture decision/evaluation of the main maintainers.

To make a long story short: Is there a way to support a language independent permission configuration in a multi language site?

Thx a lot!

🐛 | Permissions by Term | Taxonomy Permissions are not saved when using "Save and go to list"

Comment 2 months ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi guys, I have the same problem with 3.1.33 and the patch also does not work for me. To me this is a pretty critical issue, as it kind of makes this version unusable.

Some feedback would be great!

🐛 | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Contact already in list prevent custom redirect

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

🐛 | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Contact already in list prevent custom redirect

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

This patch could be a way to achieve this by configuration (just for the email)

✨ | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Support double opt-in in Webform handler

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

For me (having the patch of #3424946 installed) it does not throw errors at all. I actually would like to send a error message to the user, if the contact is already in the list.

✨ | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Support double opt-in in Webform handler

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

So from the functional point of view, this works very well - I have just installed and tested it.

Codewise it is also fine from my point of view.

✨ | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Support double opt-in in Webform handler

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Thank you! I did not see the plain diff link.

It applies very well by adding

"patches": {
            "drupal/sendinblue_api": {
                "#3424946_doi": "https://git.drupalcode.org/project/sendinblue_api/-/merge_requests/2.diff"
            }
        },

to the composer.json file.

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hi @mrshowman, is there a way I can tryout your fork? We need this feature for a client as well,

Thx a lot!
Andreas

🐛 | Focal Point | FocalPointImageWidget misses SvgImageWidget def

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Actually it looks like this is a different issue related to #3122722.

🐛 | Focal Point | FocalPointImageWidget misses SvgImageWidget def

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

This one fixes the issue:

🐛 | Focal Point | FocalPointImageWidget misses SvgImageWidget def

✨ | Brevo: Digital Marketing Tool (formerly Sendinblue) | Support double opt-in in Webform handler

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Schoenef → created an issue.

🐛 | Drupal core | [10.2] ckeditor5_post_update_code_block() throws an error for format using CKE5 but with CKE4 settings

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Hello, are there any news on this one? We would like to have this feature as well.

Thx a lot everybody!

🐛 | Drupal core | JSON:API filters are not working on Webform Submissions

Comment 6 months ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Schoenef → created an issue.

🐛 | Color Field | drupal/feeds version in require-dev is empty

Comment 7 months ago →

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

This one should be patched imideatly, it breaks actually every composer update command, if the module is installed.

#4 works and fixes the issue.

🐛 | Drupal core | [10.2] ckeditor5_post_update_code_block() throws an error for format using CKE5 but with CKE4 settings

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

I think the issue is editor.editor.basic_html, it might be a lost migration or something. In the frontend it shows that now editor is selected, but in the config it has ckeditor5.

I attached a screenshot of the UI under drupal 10.0

Many migrations around the world are probably already in this state, as linkit 6.0 allows to upgrade to 10.0 but no further until it get's updated to 6.1.

Thx for looking into this!
Andreas

🐛 | Drupal core | [10.2] ckeditor5_post_update_code_block() throws an error for format using CKE5 but with CKE4 settings

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

Ok, the above patch is for Drpal 10.1, for 10.2 this one should do:

🐛 | Drupal core | [10.2] ckeditor5_post_update_code_block() throws an error for format using CKE5 but with CKE4 settings

🇩🇪Germany Schoenef Unna

This patch worked for me: