- First commit to issue fork.
- last update
over 1 year ago 13 pass - Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 2:47pm 4 May 2023 - 🇫🇷France andypost
last patch failed to apply but there's MR created (applies cleanly) so it require review
- 🇫🇷France andypost
Closed duplicate 📌 Update README.md file according to README.md template on 2.0.x-dev Closed: duplicate
- 🇮🇳India Pooja Ganjage Pune, Maharashtra, India
andypost → credited Pooja Ganjage → .
- 🇫🇷France andypost
Closed another duplicate 🐛 obsolete text in README Needs review
- 🇫🇷France andypost
And one more 📌 Replace all references to Drupal 8 with Drupal 9 or just Drupal Closed: duplicate
- First commit to issue fork.
- last update
over 1 year ago 13 pass - First commit to issue fork.
- last update
over 1 year ago 13 pass - last update
over 1 year ago 13 pass - Status changed to RTBC
about 1 year ago 1:42pm 12 July 2023 - 🇺🇸United States volkswagenchick San Francisco Bay Area
@kavitha@specbee.com Generally, it is best practice to explain what criteria you used to move the issue into RTBC.
What did you test? Were all comments addressed? Did all the links work as expected, coding standards, clear concise sentences, and so on.Thanks.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 9:51am 13 July 2023 - 🇩🇰Denmark ressa Copenhagen
I agree @volkswagenchick. See also #3315968-22: Replace README.txt with README.md → where another RTBC was based on the patch applying, and no review of format or content.
