Question would be, what it would need to be part of it.
Currently it is a highly customized module with a lot of "simmilar" fetures, but more opinionated and an own API behind it.
Would be interesting, what is your aim and how this could work out :)
Can you please tell me, what is the bug or what your are expecting from the module?
How you would imagine an integration with the AI module?
Thank you very much!
I played around, with an alternative, when getting inspired of "spotlight" bringing people, the community under a spotlight.
first draft/idea
I also played with the Greater, Community and Individual Drop (of our Drupal Logo) so we bring the individuals also on the spotlight…
final logo worth to consider?
It also uses the new brand colors from drupal.
thank you for the issue!
yes. we did a complete new frontend relaunch.
Backend will be next :P
there we have to still fix some things.
grienauer → created an issue.
we have a complete new frontend system deployed today.
as it is a decoupled frontend, we used anothwer solution, but thank you for your hints!
one can now directly add the event to their calendar!
you can spot them on drupical.com :)
we have a complete new frontend system deployed today.
this bug is now gone and new features are in place.
you can spot them on drupical.com :)
we have a complete new frontend system deployed today.
this bug is now gone and new features are in place.
you can spot them on drupical.com :)
joachim namyslo → credited grienauer → .
was a bit late but there in the end :)
heroicnick → credited grienauer → .
Roderik, thank you for the issue!
We are in the process of releasing a complete new frontend this week! It will be written in Svelte, introducing new features and this bug is then also fixed!
Nico
jjchinquist → credited grienauer → .
grienauer → created an issue.
We discussed this issue a bit at our dugmuc meetup.
let me write together here, what we discussed:
- - Main problem is, that currently the whole text part, which is surrounded by the u is removed.
- - We think the u should NOT be allowed. even if it is a html element.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/uAlong with other pure styling elements, the original HTML Underline (u) element was deprecated in HTML 4; however, (u) was restored in HTML 5 with a new, semantic, meaning: to mark text as having some form of non-textual annotation applied.
- - Questions we had: which html elements are allowed and which not.
- - Is it possible to just remove the u and not the text inside. which helps for the most problems maybe currently occur
Todo:
- - discuss if it is possible to only remove not supported html tags and not the text inside
- - tell the leaflet maintainers, that the u tag is not sematically right used
- - add a documentation to the global translation documentation, which html tags are used
- - add some tests, so code between a t string is also checked and maintainers get an instant reply if html tags are not supported
hope this feedback helps and gives another perspective.
I think this task has a lot of side-quests one need to tackle ;P
grienauer → created an issue.
esmoves → credited grienauer → .
esmoves → credited grienauer → .
grienauer → created an issue.
grienauer → created an issue.
we had our general assembly and new documents sent to the authority
grienauer → created an issue.
grienauer → created an issue.
grienauer → created an issue. See original summary → .
When I discussed this issue at a 1:1 meeting with Ralf, and then wrote together this idea, I was not sure if this is the right way.
My first suggestion would have been fixing it upstream and then, that the theme itself provides some stylings.
But the aim was, having a working solution asap and I am baffled, how quickly here a solution was developed.
I think after drupal cms v1 we should overthink this solution (maybe just move the custom css into the belonging themes, but it feels really great, that there will be a solution for now!
When we met IRL, the first juice/beer/cocktail is on me :)
grienauer → created an issue.
jjchinquist → credited grienauer → .
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
grienauer → created an issue.
here is the press release from drupal austria https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20241108_OTS0110/gewinner-der-7-...
This would be a super smart solution!
Of course adds some "complexity" and things which needs to be kept in mind/tested, but when this works this is a really nice solution!
heroicnick → credited grienauer → .
heroicnick → credited grienauer → .
heroicnick → credited grienauer → .
esmoves → credited grienauer → .
for me it would be better to have it 1h 30min earlier, but don't count always on me :)
yes, you are right. (copy/paste issue :P)
I updated the description and added also your suggestions.
grienauer → created an issue.
I created an issue over at the Klaro JS github issue queue: https://github.com/klaro-org/klaro-js/issues/526 will update here, if we get some more details.
grienauer → created an issue.
grienauer → created an issue.
grienauer → created an issue.
+1 from me ;P
Thank you very much!
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
after I created this issue there was some discussion over at slack.
https://drupal.slack.com/archives/C07B218LQH5/p1733151734862979
I think it is important to link it here.
TL;DR: everything is right how it was designed, and this is no bug or error. as there will be a complete new Drupal version on drupal.org this is a working way, to make that transition happen and in the end new.drupal.org will be redirected back to drupal.org links.
grienauer → created an issue.
thank you atul_ghate. We will look into it!
jjchinquist → credited grienauer → .
jjchinquist → credited grienauer → .
mandclu → credited grienauer → .
added also a zip file with the current svg.
grienauer → created an issue.
@wouters_f I plyed a bit with a spark related logo, but found no nice solution/context with a drop.
I also played around with a not jet showable button design I played around. as I like the sparks more than a magic wand etc.
https://codepen.io/Grienauer/pen/mdNMvrd/dee3e8cc6266e0fc7ed172b27182f09c this is not finished at all and i played around with a hover animation. not really relevant for this issue… but maybe take it as a apark for new ideas for the logo.
Currently I have no nice Logo for the AI module with a relation to a drop etc. what would be possible to just write the Name beside my custom sparks logo… but therefore I like the Drop shaped one, which we use currently better and more unique.
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
Thank you for the MR! we will check it out.
grienauer → created an issue.
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
jjchinquist → credited grienauer → .
thank you @rkoller for the great overview!
this is a tough problem I guess…
"do we need to support the gin backend theme in Klaro?"
If there is no possibility, that a user is on a gin backend site, without to be first on a Oliviero page, then I see here no problem… e.g. if the login page comes form Oliviero. <- deleted that after I had some time to think more about that.
yes, I think so, because we can not be clear, that e.g. NO youtube video or other third party services are loaded on the drupal admin page and the content blocker is displayed/blocking the content from loading or a user is triggering/opening the consent window.
but please prove me wrong and let's have a discussion.
thx @jan. you are really quick and responsive in answering/fixing/discussing things!
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
I want to raise my concerns about adding default content.
As an example: I was the creator of the Omega3 Logo and back then, we decided, that it is a good idea to ship the theme with a default favicon. It is not :P. still nowadays, the favicon, add to homescreen etc icon is on a lot of Drupal websites visible, as it was never changed.
This will also happen with the default content of gdpr/legal notics texts etc.
It is quite complicated, what has to be visible in a legal notice. even more complex it is on a gdpr page…
I strongly have the feeling, we should only describe, what there should be visible and give some hints, but not prepare some texts with placeholders.
a predefined text will only make the operator of the website feel safe, that they need only to insert/fill in some correct values, and they are save. but it is much more than that.
We can also discuss it in one of our next JF meetings.
jurgenhaas → credited grienauer → .
Thx Kristen! Therefore I did not close it as I wanted to know why it is not possible and discuss it in a chat. thx for mention it!
I would like to add all attendees and speakers.
So it would be great if one can credit all here, as we have no attendee list and I mentioned in the meeting, that all should comment here.
Them we also can close this issue.
Next time I know and will ping the maintainers :)
thx!
thanks for showing up and great presentations and discussions.
Presentation and Video is linke in the description!
grienauer → created an issue.
Thank you for your findings! a very great start and check, so we know what we need to do!
about your concerns:
inkonsisten layouts. I think no user can add pages. but a user can add cases. paragraphs are more easy for users. and layout builder is more for admins. for me it makes sense, why it is done like this, but would be good to discuss it further.
custom code, yes this is an issue, and should be discussed upstream!
grienauer → created an issue.
+1 for me. or recipes of some features at least :)