- Issue created by @catch
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
Marked ✨ Allow SVG logos Closed: duplicate duplicate since this issue would enable svg logos to be used.
- First commit to issue fork.
- Assigned to pooja_sharma
- Merge request !9337Resolve #3462829 "Store the filepath for navigation logo" → (Open) created by pooja_sharma
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
5 months ago 2:23pm 27 August 2024 Implemented code to support image path instead of file id of navigation logo, also made some adjustments to the respective code files for the new changes. apart form nothing seems to be left.
Please review , moving NR.
- Status changed to Needs work
5 months ago 11:03pm 29 August 2024 - Assigned to pooja_sharma
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
5 months ago 10:51am 31 August 2024 Addressed the feedback, left comment on MR. PLease review, moving NR.
- Status changed to Needs work
5 months ago 1:40pm 31 August 2024 - Status changed to Needs review
5 months ago 3:43pm 31 August 2024 Addressed the feedback, left comment on MR. PLease review, moving NR.
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
I don't want to keep playing ping pong with this. Will leave for somewhere else but -1 from me as we are hard coding values and schema validation appears to be missing.
- Assigned to pooja_sharma
- Status changed to Needs work
5 months ago 5:13pm 31 August 2024 On adding validation constraints appears random test failures , moving to NW 'll debug it.
hard coding values of logo extension now added in config & added constraints validation as well
As new key
logo_extension
added, it leads to 'validation config' warning: https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/drupal-3462829/-/jobs/2613092But not getting similar warning on local even try with this command:
drush config:inspect --filter-keys=navigation.settings --detail --list-constraints
if 'll be great if anyone can share suggestion for it.
- "navigation.settings": 4, + "navigation.settings": 5, "node.settings": 2, "node.type.*": 22, "olivero.settings": 16, @@ -2788,10 +2788,10 @@ }, "perPropertyPath": { "all": { - "count": 17140 + "count": 17141 }, "validatable": { - "count": 10377 + "count": 10379 }, "fullyValidatable": { "count": -1
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
5 months ago 5:08am 2 September 2024 Tried to address the mentioned feedback, apart form it nothing appears to be left.
MR is mergeable, there is one warning validation config, it display validation count & line no. increase which is correct, no any error message displaying, not sure on the basis of it, PLease review, moving to NR.
- 🇮🇳India KumudB Ahmedabad
There is an issue occurring when clicking on the entity used for the logo from the file system.
1. Upload a custom logo:
Navigate to Administration > Configuration > User Interface > Navigation > Settings.
Upload and save your custom logo.2. Save the configuration:
Ensure the changes are saved properly.3. Verify the issue:
Go to Administration > Content > Files.
Locate your most recently uploaded logo file.
Click on the Usage link for this file.
Observe the error that appears.The website encountered an unexpected error. Try again later.
Drupal\Component\Plugin\Exception\PluginNotFoundException: The "logo" entity type does not exist. in Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityTypeManager->getDefinition() (line 138 of core/lib/Drupal/Core/Entity/EntityTypeManager.php).
@kumudb, This issue not replicate due to these MR changes , I have verified & created issue here 🐛 Page break error display :The "logo" entity type does not exist Active , can track there.
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Will leave for additional reviews
But my thoughts
But logo_managed variable name for a path doesn't make much sense to me
Logo_extensions seems to have no field (is there not a way to get allowed file uploads?)
The schema for logo_managed says it's allowed to be null but if it's a path to an image then should validate it's a valid path. But logo_managed variable name for a path doesn't make much sense to me
Agree , 'll working on the same, keep logo_path variable name.
Logo_extensions seems to have no field (is there not a way to get allowed file uploads?)
Generally when we upload the image on the node form , there is only visible image field, & image extension not visible to the user , it is attached with field storage.
Here if we 'll add logo_extension field then on the same form logo extension & logo upload field both 'll be visible, this 'll be bit confusing experience for the user.
The schema for logo_managed says it's allowed to be null but if it's a path to an image then should validate it's a valid path.
On the basis of my understanding trying to rply correct me if I 'm missing anything, 'logo_managed' can be null because at the BE there are three opts available: default: (by default this value is selected when this selected then image path not get from the config, so image path not store as well, due to which I set null ) ,
hide: in this opt no image 'll display & not store it's value in config, custom logo update: only in this opt image store, so on the basis above mentioned scenarios keep it null.- First commit to issue fork.
- Status changed to Needs work
4 months ago 11:24am 9 September 2024 - 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for the work on this one!
Once 📌 Adjust custom navigation logo dimensions on upload Fixed has been merged, the ground for this one is ready.
Merged main into the MR branch and solved the conflicts as best as I could. Also added some new comments.
Wonder if the aim of this one would be to have a similar UI and logic we already have for the theme logo, but that could be discussed later.
- Assigned to pooja_sharma
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
4 months ago 6:08pm 9 September 2024 Applied suggestions on MR & fixed test failures as well now MR is meregeable.
PLease review, moving NR.
- Status changed to Needs work
4 months ago 8:35am 13 September 2024 - 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your help here @pooja_sharma.
According the Issue Summary, the expected outcome of this issue is to have a similar UI and behavior to /admin/appearance/settings page, where the logo path can be defined manually, or uploading a custom file, whose path is stored in config.
The difference with Logo image is that logic to adjust the file dimensions on upload should still be there.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Marking as Navigation stable blocker because would solve indirectly 🐛 Page break error display :The "logo" entity type does not exist Active
- 🇩🇪Germany marc.bau
The difference with Logo image is that logic to adjust the file dimensions on upload should still be there.
Please also do not forget that uploading SVG files must be forbidden where setting a path to a SVG file need to be allowed. - 🇨🇦Canada m4olivei Grimsby, ON
I've closed 🐛 Page break error display :The "logo" entity type does not exist Active as a duplicate of this issue, since we'll resolve that here.
Let's credit: pooja_sharma, kumudb, skaught, plopesc, and smustgrave for review / patches when we have a commit here please.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Created a new MR for this one where the approach is more similar to
/admin/appearance/settings
.Site administrator can enter a path or upload an image whose path will be automatically used.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Attaching screenshot of the new Navigation settings UI.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
MR refactored once 📌 Reorganize navigation settings to be more consistent RTBC has been merged.
The Needs Review Queue Bot → tested this issue. It fails the Drupal core commit checks. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".
This does not mean that the patch necessarily needs to be re-rolled or the MR rebased. Read the Issue Summary, the issue tags and the latest discussion here to determine what needs to be done.
Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide → to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
MR updated to solve the PHPStan and PHPCS errors after ✨ Enforce return types in all new methods and functions RTBC
- 🇪🇸Spain penyaskito Seville 💃, Spain 🇪🇸, UTC+2 🇪🇺
Added some questions to the MR, but don't think it should block this anyway.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your review @penyaskito.
Made some adjustments in the MR according to your comments.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
One open question on the MR, and two others I answered myself as I was asking them, otherwise looks good.
Updating the issue summary to embed the screenshot.
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for the review and summary update.
Answered the outstanding question.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
OK now I understand why it's there I think I've got an alternative suggestion which looks like it would be easier?
- 🇪🇸Spain plopesc Valladolid
Thank you for your review @catch.
Made a refactor of the validation and error handling logic. Hope it is good to go now.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
That looks better thank you!
Committed/pushed to 11.x, thanks!
I was going to cherry-pick this to 10.4.x but it doesn't apply, which suggests another change has gone into navigation 11.x which didn't get backported. Rather than rebasing this, I think we should instead try to backport that issue instead so this cherry-picks cleanly (or decide we only commit things to 11.x, but one or the other).
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
Did the cherry-pick to 10.4.x. The php baseline change didn't apply, after regenerating the baseline I discovered there were no baseline changes on 10.4.x at all, so just committed without it.
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.