YamlFileLoaderTest fails if you have PECL yaml installed

Created on 17 November 2023, 7 months ago
Updated 19 November 2023, 7 months ago

Problem/Motivation

The YamlFileLoaderTest fails if you have the PECL Yaml extension installed. Unfortunately PHP 8.1 and PHP 8.2 containers don't have it installed. It is installed on PHP 8 but in the move to Drupal 10 we lost test coverage. #3402448: Add PECL Yaml to PHP 8.1 and PHP 8.2 โ†’ is the issue to add in back into the PHP builds. The reason it is missing is because when we build a new PHP version PECL Yaml is often not ready so we forget. This has meant that ๐Ÿ› Exceptions from errors in services.yml files should tell you which file Fixed was committed without being tested on PECL yaml and unfortunately it broke it.

Testing Drupal\Tests\Core\DependencyInjection\YamlFileLoaderTest
.............E

Time: 00:00.302, Memory: 12.00 MB

There was 1 error:

1) Drupal\Tests\Core\DependencyInjection\YamlFileLoaderTest::testExceptions with data set "YAML must be valid" ('   do not:\n      do this for...o Bar!', 'The file "vfs://drupal/module...d YAML')
Array to string conversion

Not having PECL yaml test coverage makes it impossible to have confidence in issues like #2951046: Allow parsing and writing PHP constants and enums in YAML files โ†’ which are important as this will allow us to have enums as service arguements.

This is critical because we might break Drupal on sites with PECL yaml installed at any time.

Steps to reproduce

  • Install pecl yaml
  • Run the test

Proposed resolution

Fix the test and provide evidence of local success so we can get #3402448: Add PECL Yaml to PHP 8.1 and PHP 8.2 โ†’ done

Remaining tasks

User interface changes

None

API changes

None

Data model changes

None

Release notes snippet

N/a

๐Ÿ› Bug report
Status

Fixed

Version

10.1 โœจ

Component
Baseย  โ†’

Last updated 1 minute ago

Created by

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Merge Requests

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @alexpott
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    Amazingly this also surfaces a bug we made in 2014!

            if ($invalid_keys = array_diff_key($content, array('parameters' => 1, 'services' => 1))) {
                throw new InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('The service file "%s" is not valid: it contains invalid keys %s. Services have to be added under "services" and Parameters under "parameters".', $file, $invalid_keys));
            }
    

    This is causing the array to string conversion in the test... this code has not changed since 2014 in #2269385: DependencyInjection YamlFileLoader is out of date โ†’

  • Merge request !5455Fix test with PECL yaml โ†’ (Open) created by alexpott
  • Merge request !5456Draft: Install PECL yaml โ†’ (Open) created by alexpott
  • Status changed to Needs review 7 months ago
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    So I managed to install pecl yaml in gitlab using the ci file... so https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/jobs/357484 shows the failure. I've merged the fixes to MR that does and hopefully we'll see it green.

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    So yep we can see that the MR fixes this

    See https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/jobs/357749 - PECL yaml installed + See changes - it is green
    See https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/jobs/357743 - PECL yaml installed + only test changes - it is broken as expected.

    Going to close the MR that installs PECL yaml as that is not the one to commit.

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    Decided to mark the test only MR as a draft so it's obvious which one to commit but it is also easy to find the testing.

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉIndonesia el7cosmos ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ GMT+7

    It seems there are two things here:

    The first one is this test case

       do not:
          do this for the love of Foo Bar!
    

    will be treated as invalid by YamlSymfony, but valid by YamlPecl

    The second is the array to string conversion in exception message for invalid keys. Looking at the expectation message on each test case, it seems invalid keys don't have a test case yet.

    In my opinion, we need to make that test case above also invalid if parsed by YamlPecl and make another test case to cover the invalid keys.

    I try that this yaml is invalid by YamlPecl

       do not:
          do: this: for the love of Foo Bar!
    

    changing the test case to this make the test passed.

    And then after that we can add a test case for invalid keys.

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    @el7cosmos great ideas... done that and now we have the same coverage on PECL and Symfony. Nice.

  • ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ทFrance andypost

    One test stull fails

  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom alexpott ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ

    @andypost that's not related to this issue, afaics. \Drupal\Tests\settings_tray\FunctionalJavascript\SettingsTrayBlockFormTest::testBlocks() is failing on HEAD too.

  • ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธUnited States mikelutz Michigan, USA

    Saw this in #contribute and was curious. I haven't been involved in the YamlPecl stuff to date, so I may be wrong here, but I'm wondering if someone can tell me if I am off here.

    From looking at to \Drupal\Component\Serialization\Yaml we always encode via Symphony Yaml, but we decode with YamlPecl if it is available, and fall back to SymphonyYaml if it isn't.

    do not:
          do this for the love of Foo Bar!
    

    is valid yaml in yamlPecl but not symfonyYaml.

    If we change the test for invalid yaml to something that is invalid on both, and then add PeclYaml to the test containers, does that put us in a position where we could commit some config with the above format, have it pass all tests (as we are using PeclYaml), and then be broken a system that is relying on SymfonyYaml? Do we lint yaml files to the symfony standard somewhere to make sure we are not potentially committing something that Symfony would find invalid? Are there other concerns that if we add YamlPecl to the test containers that we are then not testing anything with the SymfonyYaml fallback? Given than SymfonyYaml and YamlPecl have different opinions on the above format, I wonder what other differences might be lurking that we won't catch later if we take SymfonyYaml out of tests.

  • Status changed to RTBC 7 months ago
  • ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธUnited States mikelutz Michigan, USA

    Chatted with @alexpott in Slack about this, and I feel better. As mentioned, historically we were testing with YamlPecl, and it is important that we go back to that, to avoid breaking things with the extension, and it seems we have enough compatibility tests to be comfortable with doing so.

    I am curious though, (and I havenโ€™t had enough coffee this morning to wade through the spec) whether that format is valid YAML or not according to the YAML spec. if it is, then maybe there should be an issue against symfonyYaml to allow it.

    • catch โ†’ committed 2155f016 on 10.1.x
      Issue #3402548 by alexpott, mikelutz, el7cosmos: YamlFileLoaderTest...
    • catch โ†’ committed bea5ccb1 on 10.2.x
      Issue #3402548 by alexpott, mikelutz, el7cosmos: YamlFileLoaderTest...
    • catch โ†’ committed aac47f0d on 11.x
      Issue #3402548 by alexpott, mikelutz, el7cosmos: YamlFileLoaderTest...
  • Status changed to Fixed 7 months ago
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งUnited Kingdom catch

    Committed/pushed to 11.x and cherry-picked back to 10.1.x, thanks!

  • Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Production build 0.69.0 2024