- Issue created by @thejimbirch
- Status changed to Needs review
3 months ago 3:57pm 23 August 2024 - Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to RTBC
3 months ago 4:53pm 23 August 2024 - 🇮🇳India ankitv18
As per the issue description and gitlab pipeline failure for previous minor i.e D10.2.x ~~ I would strongly suggest to cut new major branch with minimum support of D10.3
cc: @berdir
- 🇧🇪Belgium BramDriesen Belgium 🇧🇪
I don't really see the need for a new branch. 10.2 is already dropped from active support and will drop security support in a few months.
- Status changed to Needs work
3 months ago 9:04pm 23 August 2024 - 🇨🇭Switzerland berdir Switzerland
I'm not really willing to drop last minor testing, and even less so to to create a major new release because of a single new optional config key.
I understand what recipe API is trying to do, but this feels like a adding quite some burden on maintainers just because core decides to add a new feature. What's redirect supposed to do when views adds another such key in the next minor? and another in the next? Release new minor/major versions every time that then need to be maintained?
Maybe config schema should include a default value system, and missing values that match the default could be ignored somehow? Just thinking out loud.
- 🇺🇸United States thejimbirch Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Updating to add the view file in the Redirect 404 submodule.
- 🇺🇸United States DamienMcKenna NH, USA
While the tests fail, has anyone tested manually installing this change on a 10.2 site? I feel like this should be something that core handles better.