Remove dependency of Dynamic Entity Reference (DER)

I'm setting to Needs Review because I did a very rough WIP for an idea on how we could do this.

The gist of the idea:
Instead of storing the entity_id field as a DER, just store an internal link and derive the entity data from loading the internal path (kind of like the menu_link_content module in core does)

That way even if the entity has been deleted we would have a reference to where it came from.

Does this idea gel with the maintainers?

The failures are expected BTW, I just need some confirmation on the approach before I tackle those.

I am very open and positive to this. The implementation details can be tweaked too I guess, but I can't see why this would not cover at least most of the usecases. One aspect that I do not know if works or not is if an entity type does not actually have a canonical URL. Is that possible or common? If I created a custom entity type , could I opt to not have it have a canonical URL?

First of all @joelpittet’s thank you to move forward on this.

I currently have no time to review because of customer projects. But in one project I will soon create at least one entity type which don't need a canonical route definition. This makes sense when if an entity is just for storing data or its managed via other entities. A good example is the paragraph module and its entity type. Currently there is no "links" section defined.

I guess for the paragraphs module (and others like it, storage → module for example).

You'd probably want the host entity URL anyway, right? Currently the URL is shown (when possible) on the report page.

Sure but I was referring to being able to load (or save for that matter) the entity you want to check from the URL 🤓

joseph.olstad → made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

I have started working on this and I hope to finish it within the next few days

Okay, so I added two base fields: parent_entity_id and parent_entity_type_id instead of using DER field or a link field.

Adding two base fields for storing entity_type_id and entity_id looks like a simpler and more reliable solution for me.

I'll spend some more time testing this one. If someone else can test it and/or provide some feedback - feel free :)

I checked the MR, added a minor suggestion.

Committed on 2.0.x, thanks everyone for your contribution!

I didn't found the time to test and code but I want to thank everyone involved to solve this.

Nice work on this! Very good to remove der if it's not needed!

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

I just wanted to add that I received a logical error when trying to update this module, because the removed dependency is still installed in the active configuration upon deploy. This causes drush updb to fail. This is normal Drupal deploy behavior and cannot be prevented afaik.

 [error]   (Currently using Missing or invalid module The following module is marked as installed in the core.extension
configuration, but it is missing:
 * dynamic_entity_reference

I solved this by doing two deploys:
First composer require the dependency that was removed in the latest update.
The rest of the flow can stay the same, so:
dependency should be removed from core.extension.yml file
Then deploy.
Only difference is Drush updb won't fail this time around. Because you will have put the dependency back in place separately.

For the next deploy you can remove the required dependency, once and for all.

Both this updb error and my solution seem logic to me, keeping the Drupal deploy strategy in mind, so I didn't see the need to create a new ticket. I just wanted to put this out there in case other developers struggle with.

@frederikvho - Thanks for your comment and work-around! I am seeing the same thing running drush updb after upgrade to 2.1.0-alpha1.