- 🇳🇿New Zealand DanielVeza Brisbane, AU
I think this still makes sense. As most people have pointed out already, this isn't an improvement for everyone but introduces no regressions.
Patch still applies to 10.1 with some fuzz. Added an updated patch for 10.1 and kicking off tests.
- 🇮🇳India Rinku Jacob 13 Kerala
Hi @DanielVeza, Applied your patch successfully and i got the solution. It was added a simple title attribute . Need RTBC+1.
- Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 3:04am 2 April 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Can we also add aria-label. May help expand the users it will help.
Also leaning towards the idea if a simple assertion could be added anywhere to verify the attributes are present.
- 🇮🇳India Gauravvv Delhi, India
I have added "aria-label" to the checkbox, attached interdiff for same.
Assertion still needs to be added.
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Thanks look good! And so we don't break it wonder if we can a 2 line assertion somewhere for those values.
- 🇨🇦Canada mgifford Ottawa, Ontario
We really should be seeing this use of title as being a form of technical debt. It just isn't an inclusive approach. I am adding a link to the need to actually build a better solution for tooltips. The disabled text could go in the description field rather than the title. It isn't a WCAG failure though, just not a great pattern to repeat.
- Status changed to Closed: duplicate
7 months ago 12:12pm 9 November 2023 - 🇫🇮Finland lauriii Finland
There's another issue trying to solve the same problem with different approach: ✨ Improve usability of disabled checkboxes on module listing page Needs review .