Is this idea still relevant/active?
My understanding is that
field_layout
is not needed anymore becauselayout_builder
now provides the expected functionalities.Shouldn't we mark this idea as Closed (won't fix) and remove it from this list β ?
- π¬π§United Kingdom catch
@matthieuscarset layout builder can be configured for view modes, but not for form modes - this is still only handled in core by field_layout. see π [META] Enable layout builder for form displays, and deprecate field_layout Postponed
- π©πͺGermany donquixote
I don't like layout builder as a universal replacement for traditional entity displays.
It seems to me that it targets a specific type of user that does not really exist in the projects I work with.
But perhaps I don't see the full picture.Having field_layout in core is nice, but it being experimental may scare people (including me) from using in production.
The field_layout module (similar to display suite) is also limited in that it only allows one layout per view mode.
An alternative would be to insert layouts into a display, similar to field groups.
Doing this in contrib is always going to be messy. But in core it could work.We could also make it easier to insert other dynamic elements into a display.