San Diego
Account created on 16 February 2009, over 15 years ago
#

Recent comments

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

@Gomez_in_the_South
It is in the 3.0.0 release. There are no steps required to upgrade from the 2.x to 3.x series, it is safe to switch.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Clever. Have you experienced the behavior if the temp store expires? It has been a long time since I used it, and even then I was using a patch to customize the expiration time.

Is the default temp store time long enough for very large files? We were dealing with 500gb files when this module was first developed.

Nice work with the various patches! I hope TUS is serving your needs well.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

This is a major code undertaking and is unlikely to happen.
There are other modules that provide some of the mentioned features like adding files from a Remote URL; though not for the Uppy widget.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

This one needs to be re-rolled. There's only been minor other changes, but sadly this no longer applies.
I may tackle it later. Note that it is now targeting 3.0.x branch for D10.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Applied on new branch 3.0.x

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Sorry, for some reason I did not see this issue until now.
Merged and release 2.1 created.

πŸ› | Responsive Menus | WSOD
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Odd that the merge in Gitlab didn't do it.
Nice catch btw. The automated code upgrader did some weird things.

πŸ› | Responsive Menus | WSOD
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

The MR is against the wrong branch (8.x-1.x instead of 2.0.x); and I think we want to keep $this->t but add using StringTranslationTrait.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Feel free to open if this is still relevant.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Merged - minus minor changes for the jquery once() compatibility.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

jwjoshuawalker β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Handled in πŸ“Œ Remove jquery.once dependency. Needs review

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Pushed!

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Just want to chime in and say we were experiencing this issue as well.

Very serious problem! Users would go through all the steps of a very lengthy test and at the end it wouldn't record the score in the opigno_learning_path_achievements table as 'completed', but left it stuck in a 'pending' state.
(It also caused it to fail setting the completed date in that table).

The proposed patch is simple, has anyone from Opigno seen this thread?

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

I just want to say, thank you @kanchamk - for all these patches across all the opigno sub modules with broken .install upgrades.
You went around and patched each one and deserve a medal for saving so much headache :D

🌱 | SignNow | Plans?
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

jwjoshuawalker β†’ created an issue.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Does anyone here know how to add the patch / pull request in Drupal's GitLab so that the merge can be done here?

I am away from the office for a while and there's a few issues for this project with patches posted, it is much easier to use that new system.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Great addition. No doubt there are some options we should expose in the field widget settings form for easier access.

Here is the list of options for anyone stumbling upon this:
https://uppy.io/docs/dashboard/#options

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

jwjoshuawalker β†’ made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

I'm seeing the core/once transition mentioned as a D10 upgrade step.

When was that library introduced / what Drupal version did it become available? I'm having trouble finding that information.
If it is ^D10, then we may have to create a new major version number of the module.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

I understand, thank you for the explanation.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

Why not add the UI widget to settingsForm() ?
I might add that later if there isn't an important reason.

Thanks for the contribution!

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States jwjoshuawalker San Diego

I'm confused on the wording. It looks like this patch is adding field validation to ensure that it obeys max upload size settings, is that correct?

While reading, I initially interpreted this as "let's just ignore max upload settings"; and I don't want to take that control away from site administrators.

Production build 0.69.0 2024