- Issue created by @tom konda
- Merge request !11989Issue #3521953: Prefer to replace some of obj && obj.prop in multi-lines with optional chaining if possible β (Open) created by tom konda
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Seem like good conversions to me, can't find other instances.
- π³πΏNew Zealand quietone
@tom konda, Thanks for improving the code base.
This makes the 3rd issue doing this type of task, with a title that make it hard to distinguish one from the other. Remember, the title is the commit message and will be used when digging through the history. Just reading the title there is no way to understand the difference between this issue and π Prefer to replace some of obj && obj.prop with optional chaining possibly Active . So, I am tagging this for a title update. Refer to title field β .
If there will be more of this type of issue, then make a Meta issue so the work can be scoped. Thanks.
The other issues are:
π Prefer to replace some of typeof obj !== 'undefined' with optional chaining possibly Active
π Prefer to replace some of obj && obj.prop with optional chaining possibly Active - π―π΅Japan tom konda Kanagawa, Japan
Update title of this issue.
OK. I notice to create a meta issue next time like this type of issue.
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
New tittle looks good removing that tag