- Issue created by @Kushneet
- 🇸🇪Sweden johnwebdev
Nice! I think these benchmarks and exercises are really valuable!
What is the baseline? Are we setting the CMS up locally, or using some managed solution or trial experience? Or are we benchmarking all of these three as three separate benchmarks?
If setting up locally:
Will the exercise run on Windows, Mac - or both? Linux?
Will you start with having an existing development environment? Or is setting that up part of the benchmark? - 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
Where this this benchmarking being tracked?
Came here to ask if any performance comparisons are being done - e.g. if people are setting up local ddev installs (or default hosted installs for SASS) then it would be possible to run lighthouse or similar against the install and compare vs. the default install of Drupal CMS. It could use some standard steps (e.g. testing logged out vs. as an admin etc.).
- 🇦🇺Australia pameeela
As Gabor noted in Slack, this is product benchmarking (of UX and features) rather than performance.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom catch
Right but presumably UX and features would include things like responsive image and resizing support, CSS and JavaScript aggregation or the lack of it?
And then I was hoping this could be expanded to page weight / loading times.
- 🇦🇺Australia pameeela
It's being pretty loosely gathered by contributors here: https://airtable.com/appmVfRW1N0voF7vM/shrEI3Evagd1sCmn5/tbls3Xv0A1WxkTUq0
Based on the contribution model I don't think it's feasible to include performance metrics.
