Re-evaluate numeric validator

Created on 6 February 2023, over 1 year ago
Updated 5 June 2024, 3 months ago

Problem/Motivation

Follow up from πŸ› None validator incorrectly handles numeric arguments Needs work comment 72 from @catch

I think that the None validator is used for literally everything, when no argument validation is set. So the problem is that without this code it would cause issues with the numeric validator. I think really it should not have to know which argument it's dealing with - i.e. why is it doing any validation at all if validation is set to none?

Steps to reproduce

TBD

Proposed resolution

TBD

Remaining tasks

Determine issue
Come up with a solution
Tests (if needed)
Review

User interface changes

NA

API changes

TBD

Data model changes

NA

Release notes snippet

πŸ“Œ Task
Status

Closed: outdated

Version

11.0 πŸ”₯

Component
ViewsΒ  β†’

Last updated about 11 hours ago

Created by

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Not all content is available!

It's likely this issue predates Contrib.social: some issue and comment data are missing.

  • Issue created by @smustgrave
  • Status changed to Postponed: needs info over 1 year ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam

    Ok...I'd like some more explanation as to what we should be looking at here, no idea what we should re-evaluate.

  • Status changed to Closed: outdated 3 months ago
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

    Since there hasn't been a response going to close out for now. If still a valid task please reopen.

Production build 0.71.5 2024