Allow menu items which link to unpublished nodes to be selected in the parent item selector

Created on 28 September 2016, about 8 years ago
Updated 2 February 2024, 10 months ago

Problem/Motivation

I want to be able to create a role in Drupal that doesn't have the permission to bypass node access, but can create, edit, and delete content (including unpublished content) and be able to add menu links to them.

At the moment a user MUST have the bypass node access permission to be able to create a menu link as a child of an unpublished node via the node form

Steps to reproduce

Login as an editor without the bypass node access permission but ability to create menu links
Create a parent page leaving in draft
Create a child page and notice in the menu settings you can't select the parent.

Proposed resolution

Only add the query condition on node status from DefaultMenuLinkTreeManipulators::checkNodeAccess if the user doesn't have the 'view any unpublished content' permission or the project has no node_grants implementations. The query still checks access so should still filter the list for nodes that the user doesn't have access to.

This could be considered a bug as I find it odd that a user is able to create, edit, and delete content and menus/menu items but can't set a parent to an unpublished node that even they created.

πŸ› Bug report
Status

Fixed

Version

10.1 ✨

Component
Menu systemΒ  β†’

Last updated about 14 hours ago

Created by

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia acbramley

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Not all content is available!

It's likely this issue predates Contrib.social: some issue and comment data are missing.

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    This introduces a security issue, we're now not limiting access to menu items that point to unpublished nodes for anonymous users

    And the test is adding a hook to check specifically for the actual item.

    My comment/suggestion at #68 hasn't been addressed either.

    Please don't reroll or use patches #73 through #75 otherwise you're introducing a security risk on your site.

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    Sorry, the issue is with patch #75 only, #73 and #74 have an extra check.

  • Status changed to Needs review almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    #68

    I think we almost need a lesser permission here, something like 'Reference unpublished nodes' which could also be used in the Node selection handler

    Introducing a new permission does not seem very sensible at this point, since this issue already requires checking for specific permissions for generic use cases, for example πŸ› User can't reference unpublished content even when they have access to it Needs work
    As a result, the access check can easily result in incorrect access cache metadata: πŸ› Access cacheability is not correct when "view own unpublished content" is in use Needs work

    As a more general solution, we can rely on either node access or the broad 'view any unpublished content' permission. Note that the 'view own unpublished nodes' permission was explicitly ignored to not require cache entries per user in #2250315: Regression: Bring back node access optimization to menu trees β†’ . This requirement is untouched.

    #79.1 Added explicit coverage to test unpublished content is not available in the 'Parent link' select list

    #79.2 Removed the hook from the test that checked for an actual item.

    The patch implements the following changes:

    1. The 'Parent link' select list now relies on node access for projects with node_grants implementations.
    2. The 'Parent link' select list now lists unpublished nodes for projects for projects without node_grants implementations where the user has 'view any unpublished content' permission.
    3. DefaultMenuLinkTreeManipulators::__construct() now requires the ModuleHandler, added a change record at https://www.drupal.org/node/3336973 β†’ .
    4. Added a deprecation test for the new DefaultMenuLinkTreeManipulators::__construct() $module_handler argument
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    #81 rerolled for 9.5.x

  • Status changed to Needs work almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

    Seem to have CI errors in #81.

  • Status changed to Needs review almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    Added a property for $moduleHandler, fixing the PHPstan error.

  • Status changed to Needs work almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam
    1. +++ b/core/lib/Drupal/Core/Menu/DefaultMenuLinkTreeManipulators.php
      @@ -149,7 +164,9 @@ public function checkNodeAccess(array $tree) {
      +        if (!$this->moduleHandler->hasImplementations('node_grants') && !$this->account->hasPermission('view any unpublished content')) {
      

      So we now have the check for node_grants being used, but we don't have test coverage for this. There should be some test modules around that we could install in the test to cover this I think

    2. +++ b/core/modules/menu_ui/tests/src/Functional/MenuUiContentModerationTest.php
      @@ -188,4 +189,53 @@ public function testMenuUiWithPendingRevisions() {
      +    $this->assertSession()->optionNotExists('edit-menu-menu-parent', 'main:' . $link->getPluginId());
      

      First I was worried that we only end on negative assertions, but optionNotExists does check if the specified select element exists and fails otherwise, so that is great.

    Also the current proposed fix no longer lines up with the proposed fix in the IS, so the IS could use an update

  • Status changed to Needs review almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    #86.1 Added a test with the node_grants implementation from node_access_test

    #86.2 Updated the issue summary proposed solution in line with the patch

  • Status changed to Needs work almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam
    1. +++ b/core/modules/menu_ui/tests/src/Functional/MenuUiNodeTest.php
      @@ -377,4 +377,57 @@ public function testMultilingualMenuNodeFormWidget() {
      +    ]);
      +    $this->drupalLogin($admin_user_without_content_access);
      +    $this->drupalLogin($admin_user_without_content_access);
      +    $this->assertFalse($node->access('view', $admin_user_without_content_access));
      

      Nitpick: Double login

    2. +++ b/core/modules/node/tests/modules/node_access_test/node_access_test.module
      @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
      - * @see \Drupal\node\Tests\NodeQueryAlterTest
      - * @see \Drupal\node\Tests\NodeAccessBaseTableTest
      + * @see \Drupal\Tests\node\Functional\NodeQueryAlterTest
      + * @see \Drupal\Tests\node\Functional\NodeAccessBaseTableTest
      
      @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
      - * @see \Drupal\node\Tests\NodeQueryAlterTest::testNodeQueryAlterOverride()
      - * @see \Drupal\node\Tests\NodeAccessPagerTest
      + * @see \Drupal\Tests\node\Functional\NodeQueryAlterTest::testNodeQueryAlterOverride()
      + * @see \Drupal\Tests\node\Functional\NodeAccessPagerTest
      

      Unrelated changes, if these were the only bad testing namespaces left in core I'd be ok with sneaking it in here, but they are not, so let's not fix them here, but do a new issue to fix this everywhere.
      If I search core with regex "\\Drupal\\(.*)\\Tests\\" I find a whole bunch of these all over core.
      Did a quick look but couldn't find an existing issue for it.

  • Status changed to Needs review almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    #88.1 Removed the duplicate login

    #88.2 Removed the unrelated changes and filed a follow-up issue at πŸ“Œ Update outdated class references from Drupal\*\Tests to Drupal\Tests\* Needs work

  • Status changed to RTBC almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands Lendude Amsterdam

    Looks ready to me, thanks!

  • πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺBelgium fernly

    Only patch #82 πŸ› Allow menu items which link to unpublished nodes to be selected in the parent item selector Fixed worked for me (D 9.5.3).
    Patches #84, #87 and #89 did not apply.

  • Status changed to Needs review almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10
    +++ b/core/tests/Drupal/Tests/Core/Menu/DefaultMenuLinkTreeManipulatorsTest.php
    @@ -81,12 +89,14 @@ protected function setUp(): void {
    +    $container->set('module_handler', $this->moduleHandler);
    

    Can we confirm that this test has existing coverage for the unpublished status filter.

    It looks like node 3 in that instance covers the unpublished case.

    But I can't see a functional test in core to ensure that an unpublished node link isn't output to the page.

    If we confirm we have existing coverage for that I'll be happy we're not accidentally creating an access bypass here.

    The fact tests didn't fail on #75 makes me think that we only have this unit test, and it is too tightly bound to the current implementation to fail when we make this behaviour change.

    So to be clear, we need to confirm we have a test that renders a menu with a link in it that points to an unpublished node, that confirms the link isn't output to users without access.

    Sorry for being pedantic here, but security is something we've always prided ourselves on, and I don't want to be the one to commit something that harms that.

  • Status changed to RTBC almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    Existing functional test coverage is available \Drupal\Tests\menu_ui\Functional\MenuUiNodeTest::testMenuNodeFormWidget(). This test implements a scenario where an editor is able to add/edit an unpublished node, but not view it:

        $admin_user = $this->drupalCreateUser([
          'access administration pages',
          'administer content types',
          'administer nodes',
          'administer menu',
          'create page content',
          'edit any page content',
        ]);
        $this->drupalLogin($admin_user);
        // Assert that the link does not exist if unpublished.
        $edit = [
          'menu[enabled]' => 1,
          'menu[title]' => $node_title,
          'status[value]' => FALSE,
        ];
        $this->drupalGet('node/' . $node->id() . '/edit');
        $this->submitForm($edit, 'Save');
        $this->drupalGet('test-page');
        $this->assertSession()->linkNotExists($node_title, 'Found no menu link with the node unpublished');
        // Assert that the link exists if published.
        $edit['status[value]'] = TRUE;
        $this->drupalGet('node/' . $node->id() . '/edit');
        $this->submitForm($edit, 'Save');
        $this->drupalGet('test-page');
        $this->assertSession()->linkExists($node_title, 0, 'Found a menu link with the node published');
    
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    Queued a 9.5 test

    Just to be super cautious, I did some manual testing of this and it works well.

    Steps I took:

    * Install umami with patch applied
    * Modify permissions for Editor role to allow editing menu
    * As admin create some pages, mix of published and unpublished and place them in the main menu
    * As editor edit a page (cannot create pages in Umami as Editor which feels odd, but is not related), verify you can see the unpublished items as menu parent
    * View page as editor, unpublished items show up in the menu
    * View page as anonymous, unpublished items do not show up
    * Confirm that both pages are still cacheable (for editor with DPC, for anon with page cache and DPC)

    In my screenshots, rubbish and recycling is the unpublished item

    Screenshots are for anon, and for editor
    My screenshot tool won't capture the open select field, but the unpublished item is in the list

    Saving issue credits

    • larowlan β†’ committed 08177ee3 on 10.1.x
      Issue #2807629 by idebr, pookmish, ravi.shankar, KapilV, aditya.n,...
  • Status changed to Fixed almost 2 years ago
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    Whilst this is a bug report, we're introducing a new deprecation and changing the parameters to the menu tree manipulators service - so that means it can only be in a new minor.

    I've committed this to 10.1.x and published the change notice.

    Thanks folks

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    Oh, and I meant to say thanks to @idebr for doing the work to find the test coverage I was asking about, much appreciated.

  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands idebr

    Nice to have this committed, thanks!

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States karenann

    Recently updated one of my instances to 9.5.2 and PHP 8.1.14.

    I removed patch #42 from my codebase and the problem I was having reappeared. The problem I have is that, on the edit screen, the
    Menu Settings > Parent link" dropdown will omit any unpublished items and all of it's children.

    I applied #82 and my problem is resolved.

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia acbramley

    @karenann the fix has not been backported to 9.5, it is only in 10.1.x. You will need the patch until upgrading to 10.1

  • Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

  • Status changed to Fixed over 1 year ago
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States douggreen Winchester, VA

    Attached is the backport for 9.x.

  • πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­Switzerland sraLton

    Here is a patch for Drupal 9.5.10

  • πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Canada mahde Vancouver

    Cannot apply the latest patch on Drupal 9.5.10!

  • I've looked into why the 2807629-105.patch wouldn't apply on D9.5.10 and it was just a small fix in de core.services.yml part.
    Here it is again!

Production build 0.71.5 2024