#docs infrastructure

I don’t think this is relevant now.

Projects have a documentation link field which can go anywhere, since things like documentation in GitLab pages are effectively off-site.

Documentation on Drupal.org has related content that can include projects, or any other content.

I don’t think so. It looks like a key part of the plan was to add a field to issues. That is not doable with GitLab, which does not have arbitrary fielded data.

Comment #1 refers to discussion in the group but I am not able to find it. That was 15 years ago and there is no discussion here.

Is there interest in pursing this or should it be closed?

There hasn't been work on this for 11 years. Is there interest in pursuing this?

Is there interest in pursuing the changes here?

The conversation around has shifted a lot in the last 10 years. I would argue that just signing up, without some sort of approval process, will result in spam of some sort. Much of this conversation and the original issue was before we implemented all of the user confirmation workflow to reduce spam.

There might be a path to allowing confirmed project maintainers to sign up automatically or perhaps better would be for a documentation maintainer request to be sent to the project maintainer for approval.

I doubt there is bandwidth for the development of either, but @hestenet might have some ideas.