- Issue created by @wim leers
- π³π±Netherlands balintbrews Amsterdam, NL
wim leers β credited balintbrews β .
- π¦πΊAustralia larowlan π¦πΊπ.au GMT+10
wim leers β credited larowlan β .
During the implementation of β¨ HTTP API for code component config entities Active , something tangentially related was discussed between @balintbrews, @effulgentsia and @larowlan. That led to this comment by BΓ‘lint:
I would like to propose that we don't use the
machineName
property as theid
entity key in theJavaScriptComponent
entity. We would like to allow users to update the machine name of a code component, which is not possible if that property is theid
.We could use the UUID as the
id
instead, which would be ideal for the HTTP API.I already had a conversation about this with @larowlan and @effulgentsia, and got ππ. If this significantly delays landing this issue, a follow-up is fine, I already have the code written in β¨ Managing code components in library Active with
machineName
as theid
.
#3499931-23: HTTP API for code component config entities β .
However, this caused some additional consequences, in particular wrt XB product requirement 14. Configuration management
. @wimleers surfaced concerns about that in
#3499931-25: HTTP API for code component config entities β
. In
β¨
HTTP API for code component config entities
Active
@wimleers decided to
None.
Active
0.0
Config management
wim leers β credited balintbrews β .
wim leers β credited larowlan β .