- Issue created by @Kristen Pol
- 🇺🇸United States Kristen Pol Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Move to project's queue per @leslieg.
- Assigned to sourojeetpaul
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
20 days ago 6:59am 19 August 2024 It was a bit tricky to showcase the functionality visually. This is what I came up with after a lot of brainstorming. Pls have a look...
- Status changed to Needs work
19 days ago 4:30pm 19 August 2024 - 🇺🇸United States Kristen Pol Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Thanks! I don’t think it needs the person in it and it would be good if it looked more like a form
- Status changed to Needs review
19 days ago 5:43pm 19 August 2024 Just one question Kristen,
If we remove the person from the logo then how we're going to decipher the 'clienside' aspect of the validation?
Any thoughts on that?!- 🇺🇸United States Kristen Pol Santa Cruz, CA, USA
I see. I guess it’s fine to keep it. Just looks more cluttered IMO. We don’t have a “server side validation” module so I’m not sure it’s really necessary though. Perhaps have both versions and the maintainer can decide?
Ok @kristen pol,
I'm sharing 3 variants for the maintainer to choose from...