Plan for Statistics 1.x

fgm → credited DrDam → .

fgm → credited opi → .

fgm → credited nod_ → .

fgm → credited hellosct1 → .

fgm → credited vanessakovalsky → .

Track any "view" of any entity "page", possibly also any page

Would this include visits to a view's "page" display? I'd like to see that.

A View "page" display is technically not an "entity view" for Drupal, because it does not so much display the View config entity than it executes it within some context, which runs a plugin happening to be called a "page", so it is really a different thing altogether in terms of mechanism.

It also has the issue that in most cases it will actually display other (content) entities, sometimes possibly in "page" mode themselves, multiplying the view count, preventing the association of a statistics "view" to the total number of pages seen.

But that's still an interesting question indeed. Part of the "possibly any page" first item. Editing the IS accordingly.

Certainly, if it's not feasible or desirable later on, it's possible to convert the views to use blocks and put the blocks on nodes instead.

Is the goal of the statistics module to provide useful tools to augment a Google Analytics-type data analysis or is it to provide telemetry of use of the site to augment a Splunk-like data analysis?

I don't use GA. I use statistics on its own for internal standalone metrics with views integration.

If you want more detailed feedback, you could try creating a survey of some kind.

I use statistics on its own for internal standalone metrics with views integration.

That's my use case as well.

The goal is pretty much summarized by the bit you quoted : anonymous stats. So it is definitely not an extension to GA, Matomo, and the like, as it will not rely on anything outside the site itself (no cookies, local storage, service workers, etc).

The basic idea is to focus on stats about what has been put on the screen : currently, the core version is just "nodes in full page mode" but if you look at the plan, the general idea is more about any entity in the modes chosen for counting, and possibly more (e.g. routes, routes+params) and also click-tracking, since it can actually be performed entirely anonymously.

Also, part of the idea is that the module should be a basis for third-party extensions, not trying to do everything on its own, but offering an integration point on which other services may build. A typical case for this would be stats over time, as the current core (now 1.0.0 in contrib too) only provides snapshot counts. An external service can get data from there by periodic sampling and build a history DB.

One point that has to keep in mind is that keeping stats, especially over time is costly in terms of DB writess, to an extent some users do not realize. Currently, a very coarse approximation of the cost of stats is just basically O(n) where n is the number of nodes. Now if you add click tracking it jumps to O(n^2). If you add all entity types, the multiplier for O(n^2) jumps by the number of entity types. If you add all view modes, the multiplier jumps again by the average number of bundles per entity type. And if you add history, suddenly you get to O(n^2 * s) where s is the sampling rate.

Just a typical sample on a small site with a lot of traffic: 10k nodes -> 10k*10k = 100M possible transitions in clicktracking. Keep sampling at one per minute: 1440*100M = 1.44G data points per day. Now, obviously most of these data points will be empty and will not have to be stored (assume blank = 0), but that's still a lot, with a very high maximum theoretical limit.

Most small and medium sites are not ready for this kind of DB storage. If you look at the historical issues on the core module, you'll find some users finding that just the extra load of the request rate doubling due to statistics was enough to overload their server. Hence the idea to provide an extension point so that these big data sinks can be plugged into the system instead of remaining within it.

@xmacinfo that's how I do it currently. FWIW, here is a View I'm using which you can adapt to your own needs. Beware the renaming that d.o. applied to it, and customize as you see fit.

added suggestion from 💬 can it count the total counts of all pages? Active