[1.0.x] Rover theme

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

revolt.theme

/**
 * @file
 * Functions to support theming in the VT theme.
 */

The theme name given in its .info.yml file is not VT.

/**
 * Implements theme_preprocess_page().
 */
function revolt_preprocess_page(&$variables) {

That is a hook implementation; the description must be different.

/**
 * Implements hook_preprocess_HOOK() for page templates.
 */
function revolt_preprocess_views_view_fields(&$variables) {

/**
 * Implements hook_preprocess_views_view_list() for page templates.
 */
function revolt_preprocess_views_view_list(&$variables) {

/**
 * Implements hook_preprocess_views_view_list() for page templates.
 */
function revolt_preprocess_views_view_table(&$variables) {

Those are not hook implementations for page templates.

I am changing priority as per Issue priorities → .

This thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for several months. Therefore, I am assuming that you are no longer pursuing this application, and I marked it as Closed (won't fix).

If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, then please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.

Hello there, Apologies for the delay. I wasn’t able to complete this task earlier,
but I’ve now added the new release: 1.1.6 →
Repo : https://git.drupalcode.org/project/revolt/

Please let me know if there's anything else I can assist with.

This application is by yogesh.k so only yogesh.k can reply and commit code till application approved.

Please go through all link in comment#4 for more detials.

Thank you for your feedback! I'll review and make the necessary changes to fix the issues, ensuring the code follows Drupal's standards and best practices.
Please let me know if you have any further suggestions or if there's anything else I should be aware of while making these updates.

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

1. main is a wrong name for a branch. Release branch names always end with the literal .x as described in Release branches → .

The main branch has been deleted, and the default branch is now set to 1.0.x.