- Issue created by @heddn
- 🇳🇴Norway svenryen
We probably should avoid using that library in 2.x and leave 8.x-1.x at status quo.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 8:34pm 22 November 2023 - 🇬🇧United Kingdom schillerm
Hi, I tried to apply patch #4 to version 2.0.x-dev and got the error, "Could not apply patch!".
Took a look at the patch and saw that it seems to be trying to remove/update the line.."drupal/core": "^8.9 || ^9 || ^10"
in the file /composer.json.
In version 2.0.x-dev this line does not have the ^8.9 || bit in it.
I guess this is why the patch does not apply? or am I patching against the wrong version? - Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 6:44pm 23 November 2023 - 🇮🇹Italy apaderno Brescia, 🇮🇹
That is correct: The composer.json file contains the following lines.
"require": { "drupal/core": "^9 || ^10", "drupal/coloris": "^1" },
The patch does not apply to the 2.0.x branch, which is the one to change.
- First commit to issue fork.
- Merge request !131Issue #3380490: Replaced the deprecated core/js-cookie with js_cookie/js-cookie assest library. → (Open) created by ankithashetty
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 6:27am 24 November 2023 - 🇮🇳India ankithashetty Karnataka, India
Raised an MR !131 against
2.0.x
branch and is ready for review now. Thanks! - Status changed to Needs work
about 1 year ago 7:12pm 27 December 2023 This is a version of the patch from the MR for the current stable version.
- Status changed to Needs review
12 months ago 5:00am 7 February 2024 - 🇮🇳India ankithashetty Karnataka, India
Thanks @lucashedding, addressed #11 MR comments.
Please review. - Status changed to RTBC
12 months ago 2:04pm 7 February 2024 - 🇳🇴Norway svenryen
@heddn, @ankithashetty, thanks for the contribution to v2.0.x!
This should be possible to merge (although v2 essentially does nothing at this point and can't be used), and the plan is to rewrite the code and abolish the need of
js_cookie:js_cookie
in version 2.0.x, or should I close it, leaving a mention that it's obsolete?Should we leave this issue open and conclude something so that it doesn't get merged later on?
- Status changed to Needs work
6 months ago 3:15pm 20 July 2024 - heddn Nicaragua
I am using this patch on the 1.x branch, not 2.x. It is only assigned to 2.x because typically develop happens on the latest branch and is backported to earlier. If that isn't the case here, we can easily just move it to 1.x, commit things and leave 2.x for a later point.
- Status changed to Needs review
6 months ago 5:20pm 24 July 2024 - Status changed to Needs work
6 months ago 5:21pm 24 July 2024 - 🇮🇹Italy apaderno Brescia, 🇮🇹
The merge request is 119 commits behind the upstream repository.
- heddn Nicaragua
It looks like for the 1.x version of this module, js_cookie was entirely removed. That needs to be forward-ported.