Offering to (Co-)Maintain Media Private Access

Created on 12 April 2023, about 1 year ago
Updated 19 April 2023, about 1 year ago

Hi @marcoscano,

as this module is still helpful in some cases as experimental solution for core issues like

because core media still lacks these functionalities, which is especially an issue for "private" media and files, I'd like to revive this module.

For that reason I'd like to offer my help as Maintainer or Co-Maintainer (@marcoscano should decide) together with my teammate @Grevil.

So the plan is to have this module in place as workaround for the future. Role funtionality could be made stable, while other parts could stay experimental due to core limitations.

Finally I hope this will one day go into core ;)

πŸ“Œ Task
Status

Postponed

Version

2.0

Component

Miscellaneous

Created by

πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @Anybody
  • πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺGermany Grevil

    I confirm the Co-Maintainership offer! :)

  • Status changed to Postponed about 1 year ago
  • πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΈSpain marcoscano Barcelona, Spain

    Thank you @Anybody and @Grevil for the offering to collaborate! πŸ‘

    Unfortunately I still feel this module isn't ready for production (or at least for being promoted as "ready"), since less experienced site builders and developers could blindly install it and oversee some scenarios where it could actually be exposing private information on their sites. The main point of concern to my eyes is πŸ“Œ Implement list access control / query alter Active , which would be a blocker since list access is as important as standalone routes access.

    Concerning co-maintainership, I'm open to having others on board, but let's first work on issues together for some time, that will help us to know each other better and have a better co-maintenance over time. I'd suggest to try to work on πŸ“Œ Implement list access control / query alter Active as a first step, and then maybe go from there?

    Thanks!

  • πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica

    Hi @marcoscano thanks for your feedback and nice to hear you're interested in pushing things forward here.

    Regarding the risks and readyness, I totally agree. That point was based on ✨ Split experimental access modes into submodules Active . Perhaps you could have a look, if you like the plan?
    As first step I'd like to fix πŸ“Œ Drupal 9/10 compatible release and plan? Fixed so that the module is usable and testable with Drupal 9 and 10 again, even if still experimental.

  • πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica

    @marcoscano: We updated some of the issues, would be nice if you could have a first look and provide feedback. Furthermore it would be great, if the Drupal 9 / 10 compatibility fix would be pushed to make the module usable there asap.

    Thanks :)
    Let us hear, what you think about the separate issues.

  • πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺGermany Anybody Porta Westfalica
Production build 0.69.0 2024