- Issue created by @TheodorosPloumis
- Merge request !3Issue #3349663: Error: Call to a member function grantPermission() on null in userprotect_install() β (Merged) created by TheodorosPloumis
- π¬π·Greece TheodorosPloumis Greece
Adding a plain patch from the first merge request.
- π³π±Netherlands megachriz
Hm, so if I understand correctly, it is possible that the authenticated user role does not exist?
I'm happy to merge the patch, but isn't this also a bug in the drush site install script? User Protect depends on the User module - which upon install - should install the role "authenticated". Or not? Can a Drupal site technically work without that role?
- π³π±Netherlands megachriz
Side note: I see that tests are failing on Drupal 10.1. Something must have changed in Drupal 10.1 lately because about a month ago tests were still passing on that version.
- π¬π·Greece TheodorosPloumis Greece
It may be a core issue since I get this for several projects that use the same code on hook_install(). The "AUTHENTICATED" role simply does not exist for some reason dut to wrong order of execution.
See:
- https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2906107 π hook_install() is invoked before the module's default config is installed during config import Needs work
- https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/793660 π Check for failure of hook_install Needs work - πΊπΈUnited States neclimdul Houston, TX
Spent a long morning digging into this.
I don't think it has anything to do with the listed issues in #6 though. I did a big bisect of core and the problem is actually caused by π Remove special case of User module install Fixed . The impact is that user module can be installed later. This is a pretty small change for most things, it just allows user to be installed a bit later in the installer. What this means for this module is it can now be installed in the same install task instead of a previous one which installing from config.
Best I've been able to sort out this breaking this use case because Drupal installs all the modules, then imports the config. Because user.module is not being installed in the same step as userprotect.module, the user module config hasn't been imported yet and the role load fails.
The solution proposed should actually work because the changes will already be in config so the fact we don't change the role doesn't maatter. Turns out there's actually a cleaner solution used by some other modules like commerce_checkout which does the same thing with slightly less code using the helper
user_role_grant_permissions
.Attached is a patch that uses that helper.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 11:25am 28 July 2023 - last update
over 1 year ago 55 pass - π«π·France andypost
I'm using different patch, no reason to change role when installing from config
- last update
over 1 year ago 42 pass, 5 fail - last update
over 1 year ago 42 pass, 5 fail - π³π±Netherlands seanB Netherlands
Since this only seems to happen on a site install from existing config, I guess the most logical solution is checking for the
$is_syncing
flag like the patch in #8.However, the approach using
user_role_grant_permissions()
like done in #7 seems more robust and is also used in core bymedia_install()
andnode_install()
. I would vote to useuser_role_grant_permissions()
. Since the user module is already a module dependency, we don't have to check for the user module existence likemedia_install()
andnode_install()
. - πΈπͺSweden emek
We have tried the path in #7 and now installation works for us.
- Status changed to RTBC
about 1 year ago 5:21am 5 November 2023 - last update
about 1 year ago 55 pass Agree with @andypost. If we install from an existing config, we want the exact config to be imported and we want no changes. Voting for #8.
- π¦π·Argentina abelpzl
#8 works correctly and I think it is the correct way.
- last update
9 months ago 55 pass - πΊπΈUnited States neclimdul Houston, TX
I'm not sure that the sync is required but i don't see a problem with it so here's a combined version with the sync and also the more robust helper method.
- last update
8 months ago 55 pass - Status changed to Needs review
8 months ago 2:43pm 2 April 2024 - π³π±Netherlands megachriz
Thanks for the patches! Since it is likely that
user_role_grant_permissions()
gets deprecated in the nearby future (see π Deprecate user_role_grant_permissions() and user_role_revoke_permissions() Needs work ), I would rather avoid using it if not absolutely necessary. So I've based my approach on what is used innode_install()
on the MR of π Deprecate user_role_grant_permissions() and user_role_revoke_permissions() Needs work .Let's see if that makes the tests still pass. (I've just fixed the tests for PHP 8.1 + Drupal 10.2, which I wanted to get done first before addressing this issue).
- Status changed to RTBC
6 months ago 4:34pm 16 May 2024 - π¬π§United Kingdom c_archer Cumbria
Tested the MR and confirm it works as expected.
-
MegaChriz β
committed 1d6f2216 on 8.x-1.x authored by
TheodorosPloumis β
Issue #3349663 by TheodorosPloumis, MegaChriz, neclimdul, andypost,...
-
MegaChriz β
committed 1d6f2216 on 8.x-1.x authored by
TheodorosPloumis β
- Status changed to Fixed
5 months ago 8:39am 5 June 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.