- 🇺🇸United States Deg
Great plan! Having a more modern version of the Gutenberg library would be huge for us!
While you're doing refactoring, how about building this module using the NPM @wordpress/block-editor and associated packages directly, instead of a custom build scripts? Ideally, this might help smooth the transition between Gutenberg library releases.
- 🇩🇪Germany Ken Hawkins
What's need in terms of support to help further the 3.x development?
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom juc1
Remove Gutenberg Cloud module. It had potential but patterns made the library of blocks kind of obsolete
I am just starting to use Gutenberg so @marcofernandes or anyone does this mean I should not use the Gutenberg Cloud module?
- 🇫🇷France sashainparis Provins
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: it can be easily adapted to be a generic module that could be used in a controlled perimeter domain-oriented. On a dedicated package server with the right description format.
But: in between, patterns appeared to be a better way and cloud approach is limited to actual Gutenberg blocks. Which should be used only when you couldn't do the job with patterns.
In other words: You will use modules to declare a new block. And you will prefer composer to manage the reuse in your domain.
This is also true at community level through contributed modules. The main difference is: You wouldn't need to trigger a new delivery to make it available.
So: great architecture, but not the list optimized approach from a maintainability point of view.
Hope it helps a little bit.
-
marcofernandes →
committed 82e1c29a on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 feat: update to Gutenberg branch wp/6.4
-
marcofernandes →
committed 82e1c29a on 3.0.x
-
marcofernandes →
committed 9e8488bc on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 chore: Update Drupal JS Build module
-
marcofernandes →
committed 9e8488bc on 3.0.x
-
marcofernandes →
committed f7580b53 on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 chore: Change core version req to 10
-
marcofernandes →
committed f7580b53 on 3.0.x
-
marcofernandes →
committed 54c20999 on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 fix: Change edit media payload properties
-
marcofernandes →
committed 54c20999 on 3.0.x
-
marcofernandes →
committed 4e16e413 on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 chore: Remove deprecated modules info
-
marcofernandes →
committed 4e16e413 on 3.0.x
- 🇵🇹Portugal marcofernandes
Finally we have a beta release https://www.drupal.org/project/gutenberg/releases/3.0.0-beta1 →
There's still some tasks to be done from the list on the description and also we need to deal with some issues that are ready to commit to 2.x (merge to 3.0.x).
One thing that I what to move forward is the entity agnostic feature. I've checked Layout Builder implementation and I think it's simpler than what we have and it would cover any content entity without any configuration. I know codebymickey invested a lot of time implementing that feature but, even if we opt for a different implementation, definitely we'll re-use a lot of that work. Let's see. -
marcofernandes →
committed 68b016e4 on 3.0.x
Issue #3322229 by marcofernandes: Update linted js files
-
marcofernandes →
committed 68b016e4 on 3.0.x
- 🇳🇴Norway thorandre
Closing this! Yay! All done and released. Thank you all for contributing! 🎉
- Status changed to Fixed
10 months ago 9:50am 6 June 2024 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.