- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
This issue is being reviewed by the kind folks in Slack, #needs-review-queue-initiative. We are working to keep the size of Needs Review queue [2700+ issues] to around 400 (1 month or less), following Review a patch or merge request → as a guide.
This feels more like a feature request. Think some simple test coverage should be added.
Also with the UX change screenshots in the issue summary will be useful.Also did anyone see if this causes schema issues? I imagine it will as it's an adding a different option vs boolean
If it does then an upgrade will be needed for existing sites.
Thanks
- 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Patch #21 applied fine to d10 so how did you generate an interdiff in 26?
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 9:26am 9 June 2023 - last update
over 1 year ago 29,436 pass - 🇮🇳India ranjith_kumar_k_u Kerala
Added tests, please review
we added radio option values as 0 and 1 and also there is type casting in the default value section as well as the saving part, so no upgrade is needed for the existing sites.
- 🇫🇮Finland lauriii Finland
I think we'll need to also update the description because it was written in a way that makes sense for the checkbox.
- Status changed to Needs work
over 1 year ago 10:49pm 13 June 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Could point
The phrase
What does it mean if you come to the page, and the checkbox is already enabled, and you save the page? Are you going to 'put it into' maintenance mode *again*?
seems like you would experience the same if it were radio or checkbox.
- 🇳🇱Netherlands yoroy
I'm wondering if the current situation really is a stumbling block for peope? Not to deny or disparage the initial report but over the four years since this was opened nobody chimed in with similar doubts about how this confuses them and this is certainly not fixing some currently broken situation.
Without further evidence on this being an actual problem I'm leaning towards a won't fix for this.