Option NONE in dropdown list instead of ALL

Does anyone else think "none" is misleading when used this way? I'm on the hunt for a way to introduce a "none" option that works like this: Given an exposed filter based on a taxonomy reference field, selecting "none" would return all results where there is no value set for the field. This is different from what it sounds like this patch does (returns nothing), but I think it's an appropriate use of the word none. As @pcambra hints at in the screenshot in #13, "Select one" seems like more appropriate terminology for what's happening here.

@maskedjellybean

I've seen a couple of pasts from you about this need for "note set", which I found while looking for a neater solution than I already have, which is not ideal but I thought I would share as it doesn't rely on hooks.

This is zoomed out so you can see all the relevant settings, but if you make your filter a grouped filter, you can set options for 'Yes', 'No' and 'Not Set' for Booleans (and indeed other types).

Just add new grouped filters for each possible option, and then a new options which is "is none of", and select all possible options. This gives you the 'not set' I think you are looking for.

Not sure I follow the use case here. Can issue summary be updated to use a standard issue template please.

Going to close as outdated, 📌 Rewriting the text displayed for "- All -" label should occur before translation Fixed may be related but would need more detail

If still a unique issue please reopen.