Edit Summary label is unclear to users

Created on 5 May 2012, over 12 years ago
Updated 4 February 2024, 11 months ago

A very tricky part of core has always been the teaser/summary, our changes in Drupal 7 where positive but we are still not quite there. The label “Edit Summary” was confusing to many new and existing users. The label “Edit Summary” did not make clear about what is it’s functionality. Some participants did understand the functionality once they clicked on it but most of them were not completely clear or had more questions about how it works.

What do you think “Edit Summary” is?
“It is a summary of content for search engine spiders” (Existing user, participant 4)
“It is a summary of edits” [Participant assumed this to be the revision log because she is an active wiki user and on the wiki, “Edit Summary” refers to the summary of the edits to a particular content] (Existing user, participant 5)

It seems like we need to do further iterations to make this usable, it seems like much of the confusion was about the labeling and the help text seems to communicate what we want to do with just a label.

🐛 Bug report
Status

Active

Version

11.0 🔥

Component
Node system 

Last updated about 9 hours ago

No maintainer
Created by

🇳🇱Netherlands Bojhan

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
  • Usability

    Makes Drupal easier to use. Preferred over UX, D7UX, etc.

  • Accessibility

    It affects the ability of people with disabilities or special needs (such as blindness or color-blindness) to use Drupal.

Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Not all content is available!

It's likely this issue predates Contrib.social: some issue and comment data are missing.

  • 🇫🇮Finland simohell

    This issue is important but has changed a lot over the years.

    With Drupal 11 and several versions before that we can have had several fields in the same node with a summary each. The teaser metafore is no longer present. However I see that the label "Summary" is not properly connected to it's "parent" field whenever the summary is not closed. Having an option to close the summary also seems to be theme dependant.

    This seems to be an accessibility issue as well as in at least some situation the user might not know wether the summary above or directly below the long text field is the on that summarises that specific field.

    I guess the Summary label should always have some reference to the main field label.

    I would expect this issue belongs to field_ui but is also relevant for a number of themes.

    Attaching screenshots from Olivero and Claro.



  • 🇫🇮Finland simohell

    We discussed this issue at the usability meeting 📌 Drupal Usability Meeting 2024-02-02 Active where we agreed that a simple text change is not a sufficient improvement. At the meeting were present @benjifisher @shaal @ simohell @worldlinemine @duncancm and @rkoller.

    We came up with a suggestion to

    1. wrap summary and full text into a fieldset
      (we noted that fieldset stlyles may be too sublte for proper accessibility, but that is another issue)
    2. use field name as the label for the fieldset
    3. label text areas as summary and full text

    Summary and trimmed are terms that are used by field display add teaser is a standard view mode that implements displaying the summary and/or trimmed version.

    Full text is referenced by the summary description but not present at form.

    If we don't want to have the summary field always displayed, we can place it inside a details element. On content creation the details element should be open. On my opinion editing content it should be closed to save space if no summary text was added and open if a summary text was added.

  • 🇺🇸United States benjifisher Boston area

    One point that came up in the usability meeting (Comment #26) is that there are use cases for having more than one long-text-with-summary field, or a multi-valued field. I have never seen it, and I do not think it meets the threshold of the 80% use case, but it does come up.

    The current link to open the summary form was probably the only way to do it when this form was first designed. That was a long time ago. I think we should use a standard <details> element now that we can.

    Probably the summary should be hidden by default, at least when it is empty. That is the least disruptive change from the current behavior.

Production build 0.71.5 2024