joecorall β created an issue.
Fixed with latest release 1.0.3. Thank you for reporting!
Thanks for confirming. Looks like a code change was made on the dependent module: https://git.drupalcode.org/project/turnstile/-/commit/55638999e8ed960582...
I'll get a patch in
I agree there could be better requirements checking/alerting for this module.
Though this module's instructions do say you need to configure the turnstile module's settings (at /admin/config/people/captcha/turnstile
). As a stop-gap around this issue before adding better checks, have you done that?
Thank you for reporting this issue. We took an alternate approach to resolve this bug: https://github.com/Islandora/jsonld/pull/85
I am not sure I understand why having <front>
protected is a problem?
joecorall β created an issue.
Had the same issue here after a composer update to 2.2.0-beta1
. Applied the patch in this PR and the issue is resolved.
joecorall β created an issue.
The form element only works with entities. There is work to extend this functionality in https://www.drupal.org/project/flysystem_gcs_cors/issues/3382852 β¨ Use the field type on the custom form Active
Thank you for the bug report. Please update the module to alpha11 and the issue should be resolved.
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
Thank you!
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
Thanks for the patch and improved performance!
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
Duplicate of https://www.drupal.org/project/turnstile_protect/issues/3483806 π Automated Drupal 11 compatibility fixes for turnstile_protect Needs review
joecorall β created an issue.
joecorall β created an issue.
Putting this back to RTBC
@ankitv18 - do you still feel this needs work?
Thanks for your help reviewing and walking me through this (my first MR to core). Much appreciated! I updated the target and rebased.
Thanks for the review! I added a test I ran locally before the bugfix was applied that failed. Applied the bugfix from this MR, reran the test, and it passed. The MR is failing at https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/drupal-3443874/-/jobs/1453157#L91 but I think that's unrelated.
$ php ./core/scripts/run-tests.sh \
--verbose \
--dburl "sqlite://localhost/drupal:drupal@127.0.0.1:3306/drupal" \
--url http://localhost:8888/ \
--sqlite "/tmp/test.sqlite" \
--class "Drupal\Tests\config\Functional\ConfigExportUITest"
Drupal test run
---------------
Tests to be run:
- Drupal\Tests\config\Functional\ConfigExportUITest
Test run started:
Saturday, April 27, 2024 - 19:09
Test summary
------------
Drupal\Tests\config\Functional\ConfigExportUITest 1 passes
Test run duration: 4 sec
Detailed test results
---------------------
---- Drupal\Tests\config\Functional\ConfigExportUITest ----
Status Group Filename Line Function
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pass Other ConfigExportUITes 48 Drupal\Tests\config\Functional\Conf
Did an export at https://mr7786-fplkwrzyzaxesdidfzoff564jkup2gya.tugboatqa.com/admin/conf... successfully and no watchdog entries at https://mr7786-fplkwrzyzaxesdidfzoff564jkup2gya.tugboatqa.com/admin/repo...
joecorall β changed the visibility of the branch 10.2.x to hidden.
joecorall β created an issue.
joecorall β created an issue.
joecorall β created an issue.
Revisiting the Google Cloud Storage docs, discovered the max upload size for a single file is 5GB, so increased the max upload size to 5GB in alpha10 release. We should still add multi part upload support so we can allow uploading 5TB files.
Drupal 10 version is out.
Thanks for the MR @dakruchko. It's been merged.
Thank you for the patch! It's been applied to alpha7 release.
Thank you Seth for reporting and @code_brown for the patch. The patch has been merged and beta12 released with the fix.
8.x-1.x was the core 8.x branch. It will not be upgraded to d10
Thanks @pdcarto. Given these changes haven't been tested, I reverted the MR. Happy to merge changes for your use case if another MR is submitted.
Thanks for the MR! It's been merged.
LGTM π
Thanks for the MR. I merged it into the dev version. I am going to test this for the known node case. The code was designed to possibly support entity types other that nodes, but to my knowledge that use case never presented itself until what looks like now. So the other entity type support with solr was more theoretical. I am going to make sure this doesn't cause any regressions then cut a new release.
joecorall β made their first commit to this issueβs fork.
This fix is in the latest release. Thanks for the patch!
Thanks, everyone! Just cut a new release with this fix.