[2.0.x] Encrypt RSA

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, enable GitLab CI for the project, and fix what reported from the phpcs job. This help to fix most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed. No other people, including other maintainers/co-maintainers can make commits.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application.
• Nobody else will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. If there are other maintainers/co-maintainers who will to get that permission, they need to apply with a different module.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application. The configuration used for these tools needs to be the same configuration used by GitLab CI, stored in the GitLab Templates repository.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

For these applications, we need a project where, in at least a branch, most of the commits (but preferably all the commits) have been done from the person who created the application.
The purpose of these applications is reviewing a project to understand what the person who applies understands about writing secure code which follows the Drupal coding standards and correctly uses the Drupal API, not what all the project maintainers collectively understand about those points.

Do you have a project for which most of the commits have been done by you in at least a branch? It also needs to contain enough PHP code.

Hi @avpaderno

Yes. Branch 2.x has my commits where I added Gitlab CI tests and fixed whatever was reported, updated README.md and replaced the usage of an unsupported library with a better one. All but README.md updates are included in the module's 2.0.0-beta1 release

Those are not most of the commits (but preferably all the commits) . If it were enough to have commits, I would not have posted my previous comment.

Most of my work, upon receiving maintainership, was done in this issue 📌 paragonie/easyrsa project was abandoned long time ago Needs work at this MR which includes a lot of commits, where they have been squashed into the project's branch. Does that qualify?