The method ContentEntityBase::getLoadedRevisionId() should not return string values

Created on 21 September 2024, 3 months ago

Problem/Motivation

The method ContentEntityBase::getLoadedRevisionId() should not return string values. In the docblock the return value is defined to be an integer value or NULL when it is not set. All entity revision id's are always of the integer type.

Proposed resolution

Add type cating to the return value of the method.

Remaining tasks

TBD

User interface changes

None

Introduced terminology

None

API changes

None

Data model changes

None

Release notes snippet

TBD

πŸ› Bug report
Status

Active

Version

11.0 πŸ”₯

Component
EntityΒ  β†’

Last updated about 8 hours ago

Created by

πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Merge Requests

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @daffie
  • Pipeline finished with Success
    3 months ago
    Total: 1112s
    #288887
  • Status changed to Needs review 3 months ago
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

    As mentioned in slack will have to do some kind of deprecation.

  • Pipeline finished with Failed
    3 months ago
    Total: 338s
    #293035
  • Pipeline finished with Failed
    3 months ago
    Total: 572s
    #296045
  • Pipeline finished with Success
    3 months ago
    Total: 1116s
    #296052
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

    The requested deprecation has been added.

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

    Thanks for adding that BC layer. Will be fun to remove those TRUEs later but seems like correct path.

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    I don't think we can make this change.
    I have client projects that import content from external systems where the revision ID is a UUID and therefore is a string.

    There's nothing stopping a content entity's baseFieldDefinitions from defining the revision ID as a string.

    I genuinely think this is `Closed (won't fix)` in lieu of `Closed (can't fix)`

  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

    Hi @larowlan,

    Using revision ids that are not an integer value is not supported by Drupal Core. The docblock of RevisionableInterface::getLoadedRevisionId() is clearly stating that the method only returns an integer value. What your client project is doing is NOT supported by Drupal core.
    The problem for me with the database driver for MongoDB is that MongoDB in conditions is doing === and relational databases do ==. For them the condition revision_id = '4' is not a problem. For MongoDB it will always be FALSE.
    Would it be acceptable to only return an integer value when ctype_digit($this->loadedRevisionId) is TRUE? This would work for MongoDB and it would work non-integer revision ids.

  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊAustralia larowlan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ.au GMT+10

    Yeah that sounds good
    We can also trigger a deprecation if it's not so sites like this client project get notification that they're doing it wrong

  • Pipeline finished with Canceled
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 260s
    #322914
  • Pipeline finished with Success
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 550s
    #322923
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

    As discused with @larowlan: the loaded revision ID will only return an integer value when all characters of the loaded revision ID are numeric. The CR is updated for this change.

  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈUnited States smustgrave

    Feedback appears to be addressed for this one.

  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄Romania amateescu

    There are a few problems here:

    1. why should we treat getLoadedRevisionId() differently than getRevisionId()?
    2. the new argument defaults to FALSE but we update every usage of that method to pass TRUE. Wouldn't it be easier to not introduce the argument in the first place and only trigger the deprecation when !ctype_digit($this->loadedRevisionId)?
  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄Romania amateescu

    Using revision ids that are not an integer value is not supported by Drupal Core. The docblock of RevisionableInterface::getLoadedRevisionId() is clearly stating that the method only returns an integer value. What your client project is doing is NOT supported by Drupal core.

    That's not actually true, the @return doxygen for \Drupal\Core\Entity\RevisionableInterface::getRevisionId() is int|null|string.

    There is indeed a somewhat "implied" requirement that revision IDs are sequential integers (mostly with sort queries), but it's not strictly enforced. And UUIDv7 strings would also satisfy that requirement btw :)

  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

    why should we treat getLoadedRevisionId() differently than getRevisionId()?

    I do not want to treat them diferently. I also have πŸ“Œ The method ContentEntityBase::getRevisionId() should not return string values Needs review for the other method. The solution from this issue should also be used in the other issue. I have learned that smaller issues are easier to lands then bigger issues. That is why I split them up.

    the new argument defaults to FALSE but we update every usage of that method to pass TRUE. Wouldn't it be easier to not introduce the argument in the first place and only trigger the deprecation when !ctype_digit($this->loadedRevisionId)?

    Yes, that would work for triggering the deprecation. Only that does not allow us to change the type of the return value in core without doing the same in contrib/custom code. Doing it in contrib/custom code might cause a BR break and that is not allowed.

    That's not actually true, the @return doxygen for \Drupal\Core\Entity\RevisionableInterface::getRevisionId() is int|null|string.

    That change has been made 2 year ago ( #2941148: Fix Drupal.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingReturnType β†’ ) to fix a PHPCS rule. In Drupal Core are all used revision IDs integers. No string revisions IDs. Maybe a good idea for a followup.

    I am not against supporting UUIDs as revision IDs. What I would like for MongoDB is that revision IDs are returned as the correct type. When they are an integer they should be returned as an integer value, not a string value. When they are a string value like with a UUID then they should be returned as a string value. I have updated the title and the IS.

  • Pipeline finished with Failed
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 779s
    #324843
  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄Romania amateescu

    What I would like for MongoDB is that revision IDs are returned as the correct type. When they are an integer they should be returned as an integer value, not a string value.

    The problem is (and this applies to πŸ“Œ The method ContentEntityBase::getRevisionId() should not return string values Needs review as well) that it's not currently possible within the Entity API to type cast anything. And that's because $entity->get('revision_id')->value returns a string, and we can't really enforce a policy for not using that way of retrieving the revision ID. So even we change getLoadedRevisionId() and getRevisionId() to return integers, the MongoDB driver has no actual guarantee that's what it will receive in all cases.

    I think a better way would be for MongoDB to typecast field values by itself when needed, but I don't know the codebase at all to make an actual informed proposal for where it should do that.

  • Pipeline finished with Failed
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 2412s
    #325931
  • Pipeline finished with Success
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 1048s
    #325999
  • Pipeline finished with Success
    about 2 months ago
    Total: 769s
    #326020
  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie

    The problem is that it's not currently possible within the Entity API to type cast anything.

    I think we can get the type casting from the field storage type. We are doing that already in the function _comment_entity_uses_integer_id() and in the method Drupal\Core\Entity\ContentEntityStorageBase::cleanIds(). I have updated the PR to use the field storage type for type casting the return value.

  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡±Netherlands daffie
  • Status changed to Needs work 28 days ago
  • The Needs Review Queue Bot β†’ tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".

    This does not mean that the patch necessarily needs to be re-rolled or the MR rebased. Read the Issue Summary, the issue tags and the latest discussion here to determine what needs to be done.

    Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide β†’ to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.

Production build 0.71.5 2024