- Issue created by @droces
- 🇮🇳India vishal.kadam Mumbai
Thank you for applying!
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
- If you have not done it yet, you should run
phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice
on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report. - For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
- The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
- We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .
The important notes are the following.
- It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
- Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
- It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .
- If you have not done it yet, you should run
- Status changed to Needs work
4 months ago 5:31am 5 September 2024 - 🇮🇳India rushiraval
1. Fix phpcs issues.
phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice --extensions=php,module,inc,install,test,profile,theme,css,info,txt,md,yml amswap/
FILE: README.md
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 0 ERRORS AND 3 WARNINGS AFFECTING 3 LINES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 | WARNING | Line exceeds 80 characters; contains 90 characters
41 | WARNING | Line exceeds 80 characters; contains 83 characters
42 | WARNING | Line exceeds 80 characters; contains 91 characters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------FILE: src/Form/AmswapConfigForm.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 1 ERROR AFFECTING 1 LINE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 | ERROR | [x] Use statements should be sorted alphabetically. The first wrong one is Drupal\Core\Link.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHPCBF CAN FIX THE 1 MARKED SNIFF VIOLATIONS AUTOMATICALLY - 🇮🇳India vishal.kadam Mumbai
1. FILE: amswap.info.yml
core_version_requirement: ^8 || ^9 || ^10
The Drupal Core versions before 8.7.7 do not recognize the core_version_requirement → key.
2. FILE: amswap.module
/** * @file * Contains amswap.module. */
The usual description for a .module file is Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the module name given in the .info.yml file.
- Status changed to Needs review
4 months ago 8:52am 5 September 2024 - 🇮🇹Italy apaderno Brescia, 🇮🇹
Actually, the 8.x-1.x is a better branch to review, since all the commits have been done by you.
- Status changed to Needs work
4 months ago 9:04am 5 September 2024 - 🇮🇹Italy apaderno Brescia, 🇮🇹
- The following points are just a start and don't necessarily encompass all the changes that may be necessary
- A specific point may just be an example and may apply in other places
- A review is about code that does not follow the coding standards, contains possible security issues, or does not correctly use the Drupal API; the single points are not ordered, not even by importance
src/Form/AmswapConfigForm.php
/** * {@inheritdoc} */ public function __construct(EntityTypeManagerInterface $entityTypeManager) { $this->entityTypeManager = $entityTypeManager; }
The constructor of the parent class has not been called. Keep in mind, it is expecting a parameter.
$url = Url::fromRoute('system.performance_settings'); $link = Link::fromTextAndUrl('Clear caches', $url); $msg = $link->toString() . ' to see the changes.'; $rendered_msg = Markup::create($msg);
Messages shown in the user interface must be translatable. Translatable messages are not concatenations of strings, including translatable strings.
src/Tests/LoadTest.php
The test is checking the front page can be loaded, but the module does not alter the front page. It means the test is not testing the module works, and it should be removed.
Furthermore, Drupal core already tests the front page.