[1.0.x] Webform Password Protection Handler

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect → for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist → to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review → gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications → , Application workflow → , What to cover in an application review → , and Tools to use for reviews → .

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool → only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues → .

1. Fix phpcs issues.

phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice --extensions=php,module,inc,install,test,profile,theme,css,info,txt,md,yml webform_password_protection_handler/

FILE: webform_password_protection_handler/src/Plugin/WebformHandler/PasswordProtectionHandler.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 1 ERROR AFFECTING 1 LINE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 83 | ERROR | The array declaration extends to column 94 (the limit is 80). The array content should be split up over multiple lines
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


FILE: webform_password_protection_handler/src/Form/PasswordProtectionForm.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 0 ERRORS AND 1 WARNING AFFECTING 1 LINE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 101 | WARNING | Unused variable $token.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. FILE: README.md

The module uses a README.md file instead of a README.txt file. While the Drupal coding standards have not been yet updated about that, the Drupal.org community consider that positive.
Since there is a README.md file, that should follow the content and formatting described in README.md template → .

3. FILE: webform_password_protection_handlers.info.yml

core_version_requirement: ^8 || ^9 || ^10 || ^11

The Drupal Core versions before 8.7.7 do not recognize the core_version_requirement → key.

4. FILE: webform_password_protection_handlers.module

/**
 * @file
 * This is the module to alter webform.
 */

The usual description for a .module file is Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the module name given in the .info.yml file.

5. FILE: src/Token.php

  /**
   * Token constructor.
   *
   * @param \Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\RequestStack $request_stack
   *   Request stack service.
   */
  public function __construct(

The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.

Fixed PHPCS and related errors. Please review it.

Rest seems fine to me.

Let’s wait for other reviewers and Code Review Administrator to take a look and if everything goes fine, you will get the role.

Hi @vishal.kadam thanks for your feedback.
I have a question: how to change the status of the module from yellow to green? I have to wait until i get the role?

After receiving the vetted role, you need to edit the project and opt into security advisory coverage. Once this is done, a green shield will appear on the project page for the stable release.

As a side note, since this project has been 30-August-2024, it will be necessary to wait ten days before opting into security advisory coverage.

Thank you for your contribution and for your patience with the review process!

I am going to update your account so you can opt into security advisory coverage any project you create, including the projects you already created.

These are some recommended readings to help you with maintainership:

• Dries → ' post on Responsible maintainers
• Maintainership →
• Git version control system →
• Issue procedures and etiquette →
• Maintaining and responding to issues for a project →
• Release naming conventions → .

You can find more contributors chatting on Slack → or IRC → in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved → !
Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review → . I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

I thank the dedicated reviewers as well.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.