- Issue created by @c-logemann
- 🇺🇸United States fathershawn New York
Here's the original post from @C-Logemann
The library works pretty good but just follow the examples of the original code makes HTML invalid.
Try https://validator.w3.org/ with:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>test</title> </head> <body > <div hx-get="/test/info" hx-trigger="every 1s" class="test"></div> </body></html>With data prefix it also works but it's now valid:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>test</title> </head> <body > <div data-hx-get="/test/info" data-hx-trigger="every 1s" class="test"></div> </body></html> - Status changed to Fixed
about 1 year ago 1:45pm 22 June 2024 - 🇫🇷France nod_ Lille
It's great that it natively supports
data-hx-attributes. The great thing is that it doesn't prevent people from usinghx-at the same time. It's not everyday there is no downsides :)We should use the
data-hx-form in Drupal since we're following the standards. - 🇫🇷France fgm Paris, France
There is a tiny downside in that it makes the markup just a tiny bit heavier. It would be worth checking whether it is parsed at exactly the same speed, or if there is a measurable difference, although even if it is measurable it might not be very relevant.
- 🇫🇷France nod_ Lille
I checked the htmx code and they're querying the DOM for both
hx-*anddata-hx-*attributes at the same time : https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx/blob/master/src/htmx.js#L337 so there is no performance impact here, it's the DOM doing the work in either case - 🇫🇷France fgm Paris, France
OK, so it's just the tiny extra markup weight. Probably worth it ?
- 🇫🇷France nod_ Lille
It compress very well, better focus on something else if page weight is an issue
- 🇫🇷France fgm Paris, France
Makes sense, since it's just a few common values, so we validate standard markup, then ?
- 🇫🇷France nod_ Lille
we fixed a few issues that made HTML invalid over the years (duplicate ids, closing tags, that kind of things). At least we don't add known invalid html on purpose.
- 🇩🇪Germany c-logemann Frankfurt/M, Germany
Yes, it's true. With the "data-" prefix we get a little bit of more functional data to manage and serve. But it's so minimal that if you want to safe some data there are so many possibilities without getting invalid: Maybe w shorter IDs and classes. e.g. "m-item" instead of "menu-item" etc. Or we could move default public files folder from "/sites/default/files" to "/files" so all links to css etc. would be shorter. And as far as I understand it's not needed to add
<meta name="Generator" content="Drupal 10 (https://www.drupal.org)">to any page. Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.