- Issue created by @matthieuscarset
- Merge request !257Easier access to Navigation settings with task links #3442188 → (Open) created by matthieuscarset
- Status changed to Needs work
8 months ago 9:33am 21 April 2024 - 🇪🇸Spain ckrina Barcelona
Thank @matthieuscarset! Good improvement adding the link on the Extend page :)
The problem is that that the resulting UI is confusing: it looks like the settings is a child of the Navigation blocks, and when you're on the Settings, it looks like the blocks is a child of the settings. So the resulting Information Architecture doesn't make sense with the current UI elements used ("perks" of using tabs everywhere!). I wonder if the title should be "Navigation" and the 2 of them below? I'm not sure about getting to deep with menus, but I can't think as a better solution right now.
It is confusing I agree.
I still think it is better to have "Settings" and "Blocks" grouped together to prevent the kind of "duplicated labels" under User Interface.
I suggest we place just one item under Admin > Config > UI > Navigation (see attached screenshot).
Note: I have updated the route and template links from `/navigation-block/...` to `/navigation/block/...` to keep consistency.
- Status changed to Needs review
8 months ago 2:12pm 22 April 2024 - Status changed to Needs work
7 months ago 10:30pm 26 April 2024 - 🇪🇸Spain ckrina Barcelona
Moving to Needs work after getting Navigation into core.
- Status changed to Closed: duplicate
7 months ago 6:16pm 28 April 2024 - 🇨🇦Canada SKAUGHT
This branch is still against the old 'navigation entity' which is now replaced with Layout API.
Closing this as duplicate as 🐛 Enhance Navigation admin workflow with Managed Tabs. Needs review is in review now
This is a surprise but okay.
🤷 This issue existed before the other. Why did we need to create a new one @SKAUGHT ?
Anyway, I will try to catch up on the changes on the other issue #3443556.
Thank you for linking the two.
- 🇨🇦Canada SKAUGHT
We have come across a more specific problem on the new layout form (see details there) in a completely different light, and as the solution unfolded we then realized -- same solution! dups happen (:
cheers. I've added comment to add you for cred there as well.