GitLab Acceleration Initiative meeting on 31 May, 2023

Created on 17 May 2023, about 1 year ago
Updated 14 June 2023, about 1 year ago

Transcript

0๏ธโƒฃ Who is here today? Comment in the thread below to introduce yourself!

1๏ธโƒฃ Do you have any topics to propose for the meeting today? Feel free to propose them in this thread, and then I will give them their own unique threads for discussion. Conversation moving slow? Go ahead and open your own thread in the next numeric order.

2๏ธโƒฃ All things GitLab and DrupalCon

2๏ธโƒฃ 1๏ธโƒฃ Contribution room activities!Help people set up GitLab CI using the templateUpdate documentationWork on template improvementsWork on the improvements described in 3๏ธโƒฃ  below(edited)

3๏ธโƒฃ GitLab CI

3๏ธโƒฃ 1๏ธโƒฃ GitLab CI - General AvailabilityWe are still looking to get this enabled for all projects - could get the pieces together today, more likely to actually start it tomorrow - trying to dot all the i's and cross the t's@drumm may be able to speak to this further. (edited) 

3๏ธโƒฃ 2๏ธโƒฃ GitLab CI variable reviewAnyone able/willing to check if our variables include file is currently up to date with the current release /dev versions of Drupal and supported environments?https://git.drupalcode.org/project/gitlab_templates/-/blob/1.0.x/include...

3๏ธโƒฃ 3๏ธโƒฃ Usage monitoring/resource monitoringShort term:We are going to set some billing alarms and probably a monthly minute limit on at least a temporary basis - though that's a global setting across all projectsMid-term:Need to write more monitoring for this on a per project level.

3๏ธโƒฃ 4๏ธโƒฃ Testing non-default branches.Right now, testing is configured against the 'default' branch set in GitLab CI project settings.However, it's very common for projects to have multiple release branches.With some clever regex, we can hopefully set up to test branches named in common release branch patterns.

3๏ธโƒฃ 5๏ธโƒฃ  Add logic to gitlab-ci.yml workflow to attempt to not duplicate all of the automated test triggers in a fork, we just want manual tests and MR testing.Maybe we can do something clever based on fork name or group or something.

3๏ธโƒฃ 6๏ธโƒฃ  Enabling testing in the forks (edited) 

3๏ธโƒฃ 7๏ธโƒฃ Getting core testing working in a reasonable time frame (edited) 

3๏ธโƒฃ 8๏ธโƒฃ Legacy D7 testing support (edited) 

4๏ธโƒฃ GitLab - Contribution Credit and Fork ManagementWith GitLab CI much closer to the finish line, the other big piece is migrating and enabling issue workflows.We had two big pieces to solve:Contribution creditFork/MR management and permissionsFran has been building a prototype solution of a bot that gives the user the tools to handle all of these things:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P58l1_dquYXu3v6l1bvDjqIm3uWjvX_d/view?u... would unblock the permissions concerns with our collaborative workflow.

5๏ธโƒฃ Personal Access Tokens@fjgarlin has been diving into the permissions that PAT grant and checking against the list of what we've blocked.We haven't yet finished auditing all this to determine if it's all good.

6๏ธโƒฃ Feature request - per @markdorisonDo we think itโ€™s going to be possible to automate the creation of โ€œbackportโ€ merge requests? I have seen this done using GitHub Actions, but I am not as familiar with GitLab CI.

Participants:

markdorison, Bjรถrn Brala (bbrala), hestenet, drumm, FeyP, Juraj Nemec, marvil07, fjgarlin, moshe, cmlara, larowlan, Nick_vh, Gรกbor Hojtsy

๐ŸŒฑ Plan
Status

Fixed

Component

Meeting

Created by

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธUnited States hestenet Portland, OR ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Production build 0.69.0 2024