- 🇺🇸United States dww
I just found this issue when searching for core issues about CORE_COMPATIBILITY since I recently saw it while working on 📌 Add \Drupal::getMajorVersion() Needs work and thought "why haven't we deprecated that const yet?" 😂
I rebased the MR branch to 10.1.x, but I can't update the MR metadata to match. I probably should have just opened a new MR for the 10.1.x branch. The workflow for dealing with MRs is a PITA since only core committers and the original MR author can change the target branch. 😢
- Status changed to Needs work
almost 2 years ago 10:22pm 13 March 2023 The Needs Review Queue Bot → tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".
Apart from a re-roll or rebase, this issue may need more work to address feedback in the issue or MR comments. To progress an issue, incorporate this feedback as part of the process of updating the issue. This helps other contributors to know what is outstanding.
Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide → to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.
- 🇳🇿New Zealand quietone
@dww, I changed the branch on the MR. I agree there are challenges with the MR workflow but I agree with xjm that the suggestion feature is very nice for coding standards issues.
- Status changed to Needs review
almost 2 years ago 4:43am 14 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States dww
Fabulous, thanks for updating the MR. Yeah, there are good things about the MR workflow. But it's still clunky in a lot of ways. ;) We're all doing the best we can. No shade intended.
- First commit to issue fork.
- Status changed to Needs work
almost 2 years ago 11:53pm 14 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Removing credit from myself as I just clicked the rebase button.
But seems there is a CI build issue.
- Status changed to Needs review
almost 2 years ago 1:03am 15 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States dww
Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. Trivial spelling error: s/extesions/extensions/
This is now passing
core/scripts/dev/commit-code-check.sh
locally.Any thoughts on the wording of the comment, or is this now ready to go?
Thanks,
-Derek - 🇺🇸United States dww
I was going to upload a patch for 9.5.x (I really think we should backport this comment to that branch), but I just did a simulation and once this is committed to 10.1.x,
git cherry-pick
works cleanly to both 10.0.x and 9.5.x branches. So we only need the single MR and don't need any patches here. - Status changed to RTBC
almost 2 years ago 1:24am 15 March 2023 - 🇺🇸United States smustgrave
Think the change makes sense. Actually never thought about 9.x-1.0 but glad to know it wouldn’t work! Haha
-
lauriii →
committed 639b1299 on 10.1.x
Issue #3188689 by tedbow, dww: Document why CORE_COMPATIBILITY is still...
-
lauriii →
committed 639b1299 on 10.1.x
-
lauriii →
committed cbd27c97 on 10.0.x
Issue #3188689 by tedbow, dww: Document why CORE_COMPATIBILITY is still...
-
lauriii →
committed cbd27c97 on 10.0.x
-
lauriii →
committed 40cc1030 on 9.5.x
Issue #3188689 by tedbow, dww: Document why CORE_COMPATIBILITY is still...
-
lauriii →
committed 40cc1030 on 9.5.x
- Status changed to Fixed
almost 2 years ago 7:25am 17 March 2023 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.