- 🇳🇴Norway gisle Norway
Added ✨ Restrict Content Type access but show fields in Views Closed: won't fix .
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 3:38pm 7 May 2023 - 🇳🇴Norway gisle Norway
Both blocking issues has been resolved. I am creating a release candidate for a full release.
Will appreciate reviews from the community.
Thanks for all of the works @gisle!
I am running
2.0.0-rc1
in production without issue 🎈- 🇨🇦Canada Liam Morland Ontario, CA 🇨🇦
So have I. Perhaps it is time for another release candidate with the two changes since the last one.
- 🇳🇴Norway gisle Norway
I am holding back creating another RC until I (or somebody who is bitten by this bug) can find the time to do a proper review of this one: 🐛 Unauthorized users able to view unpublished translations Fixed .
I have closed the last open issue for the 8.x-1.x branch.
The 8.x-1.x branch is reported to have 9632 installs, as opposed to 1641 for the 2.0.x branch. Setting it unsupported is not going to be popular, but doing so may prompt more people to upgrade to the 2.0.x branch, bringing more people onboard for QA and review of that branch. I'll consider it.
- 🇨🇦Canada Liam Morland Ontario, CA 🇨🇦
If there isn't going to be more development anyway, having it marked as supported could give a false sense of security. It would be better to get a full release.
It would also help to update the automated testing configuration; see 📌 Automated testing configurations Fixed .
thanks for all your work @gisle.
I hear your argument that marking 8.x unsupported might cause some users to shift in their seats, but I agree with @Liam Morland... if you've already decided you aren't supporting the branch, then it's perfectly fine (and appropriate, in fact) to make it as unsupported. Transparency on the current state of the module is good and, as you say, may inspire 8.x users to update and provide needed user experience reports/testing.
- 🇨🇦Canada Liam Morland Ontario, CA 🇨🇦
As well, moving from 8.x-1.x to 2.0.x means moving from an alpha release to a release candidate. The only major difference is the removal of the rules integration. It's not a total re-write.
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom steven jones
I think all the issues listed in the issue description are now done :)
@gisle I'll let you review and confirm, and then you can roll the stable release. Thanks for all your work!
- 🇳🇴Norway gisle Norway
This looks great! Steven Jones, thank you for your excellent work!
I'm going to cut a stable release.
- Status changed to Fixed
about 1 year ago 1:17pm 6 September 2023 wow, congrats/thanks @gisle, this is awesome!
thanks @Steven Jones!
Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.