- π³π±Netherlands johnv
As a summary of the above discussion:
#1-#34 are about the new text proposal
#28 contains the latest text proposal
#39-#44 are about other proposal that better deserves its own issue, if still needed.
#40 expresses some thoughts about current behaviour
I tested in D11.1 the behaviour of the (exposed) filter operators and options: Whatever the limit/expose settings, the values that are set in 'Filter criterion' form, are directly applied to the view, when a user calls the view.Issue summary is updated to standard format.
Issue moved to views_ui.module.Regarding the text proposal, I find the additional lines hard to understand. Or even: I do not understand them at all.
As an alternative, let us compare with the other option:
[ ] "Limit the available operators" = "Limit the available operators to be shown on the exposed filter."
Then 'our' option would just be:
[ ] "Limit the available options" = "Limit the available options to be shown on the exposed filter to the ones selected above."
This is what is proposed in attached patch. - First commit to issue fork.
- Merge request !11132Change unclear Exposed filter option "Limit list to selected items" title and description β (Open) created by VladimirAus
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Just FYI UI changes should include screenshots in the summary.
- ππ·Croatia devad
Re: #51-#54
Cosmetic change of title and description is not what this issue is meant for originally . The new description should warn users of existing bug behavior. Please read previous conversation in this issue. Comment #40 in particular but other comments as well.
- πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
yea seems like there was still some discussion going on, didn't read the comments yesterday hence never changed the status.