- π¬π§United Kingdom catch
This is closely related to #2554245: Updating the entity type definition should be enough when adding new fields as entity keys β .
Based on the test fails I wonder if we could support this automatically at all or should make it optional based on a parameter or a completely dedicated new method.
That might be safer, this could be potentially disruptive and I'm not even sure if it's a bug or a feature request. I'm a bit surprised this hasn't come up, but I guess adding or removing tables from the schema is very rare, so maybe it just doesn't happen that much.
- Status changed to Needs work
about 2 years ago 3:24pm 3 May 2023 - πΊπΈUnited States smustgrave
Brought this up again with @catch asking what should happen next
I think it is "make it optional based on a parameter or a completely dedicated new method"