Spec Compliance: JSON API's profile/extention (Fancy Filters, Drupal sorting, Drupal pagination, relationship arity) needs to be explicitly communicated

Created on 21 March 2018, over 6 years ago
Updated 8 September 2023, over 1 year ago

http://jsonapi.org/format/#crud

Problem/Motivation

While working on #2931785: The path for JSON API to core , I think we overlooked one very important thing wrt spec compliance. The fact that the JSON API module for Drupal incorporates two spec extensions:

  1. Fancy filters: https://gist.github.com/e0ipso/efcc4e96ca2aed58e32948e4f70c2460
  2. Partial success: https://gist.github.com/e0ipso/732712c3e573a6af1d83b25b9f0269c8

… yet we support Accept: application/vnd.api+json and Content-Type: application/vnd.api+json. Which signifies we're implementing the base spec. Additionally, we're not even mentioning in jsonapi.api.php that this module implements more than just the base spec!

http://jsonapi.org/format/#content-negotiation says:

Content Negotiation

Client Responsibilities

Clients MUST send all JSON API data in request documents with the header
Content-Type: application/vnd.api+json without any media type parameters.

Clients that include the JSON API media type in their Accept header MUST
specify the media type there at least once without any media type parameters.

Clients MUST ignore any parameters for the application/vnd.api+json
media type received in the Content-Type header of response documents.

Server Responsibilities

Servers MUST send all JSON API data in response documents with the header
Content-Type: application/vnd.api+json without any media type parameters.

Servers MUST respond with a 415 Unsupported Media Type status code if
a request specifies the header Content-Type: application/vnd.api+json
with any media type parameters.

Servers MUST respond with a 406 Not Acceptable status code if a
request’s Accept header contains the JSON API media type and all instances
of that media type are modified with media type parameters.

Note: The content negotiation requirements exist to allow future versions
of this specification to use media type parameters for extension negotiation
and versioning.

… and sadly, JSON API's extension system was reverted. http://jsonapi.org/extensions/ currently says … on May 21, 2015.

In https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/614, Roy Fielding (of REST fame) is quoted to have written that media type negotiation like vnd.api+json is meaningless. He clarified his statement at https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/614#issuecomment-101741478. That issue spawned https://github.com/json-api/json-api/pull/650, which tried to improve things, but it was considered "too late before the imminent 1.0 release". Then, ironically, it is https://github.com/json-api/json-api/pull/660, which is mentioned nor linked in neither of the two issues above (614 an 650), and it simply removed the concept of/support for extensibility altogether. This was May 21, 2015.

It was worked on a bit in November 2015, in https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/915. Again in December 2015, in https://github.com/json-api/json-api/pull/957. And then again in https://github.com/json-api/json-api/pull/1195, in July 2017. And finally, https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/1207 in August 2017.

https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/1207 is the latest and greatest, confirmed by spec author dgeb at https://github.com/orbitjs/orbit/issues/479#issuecomment-358654119 on Jan 18, 2018. but it still hasn't actually gone anywhere — there's still nothing spec implementers can actually do …

Finally, note that http://jsonapi.org/format/#content-negotiation (quoted in full above) says the server must send an error response if any media type parameters are specified!

Proposed resolution

  1. Update jsonapi.api.php to state that the JSON API module implements the base spec + 2 extensions
  2. Figure out how to communicate in our HTTP responses that it's the base spec + 2 extensions … even though the JSON API spec literally forbids it, and there's a whole string of GitHub issues: 614, 650, 660, 915, 957, 1207.

Remaining tasks

Discuss!

User interface changes

TBD

API changes

TBD

Data model changes

TBD

📌 Task
Status

Active

Version

11.0 🔥

Component
JSON API 

Last updated 6 days ago

Created by

🇧🇪Belgium wim leers Ghent 🇧🇪🇪🇺

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
  • Needs change record

    A change record needs to be drafted before an issue is committed. Note: Change records used to be called change notifications.

  • Needs tests

    The change is currently missing an automated test that fails when run with the original code, and succeeds when the bug has been fixed.

  • Needs issue summary update

    Issue summaries save everyone time if they are kept up-to-date. See Update issue summary task instructions.

Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Not all content is available!

It's likely this issue predates Contrib.social: some issue and comment data are missing.

  • 🇺🇸United States bradjones1 Digital Nomad Life

    JSON:API 1.1 is out. Removing the PP.

  • 🇳🇱Netherlands bbrala Netherlands

    We need to revisit this with the implemented profiles and extentions in mind:

    Extensions

    Extensions provide a means to “extend” the base specification by defining additional specification semantics.

    Extensions cannot alter or remove specification semantics, nor can they specify implementation semantics.

    Profiles

    Profiles provide a means to share a particular usage of the specification among implementations.

    Profiles can specify implementation semantics, but cannot alter, add to, or remove specification semantics.

    And the difference is basically defined here:

    Semantics

    All document members, query parameters, and processing rules defined by this specification are collectively called “specification semantics”.

    Certain document members, query parameters, and processing rules are reserved for implementors to define at their discretion. These are called “implementation semantics”.

    All other semantics are reserved for potential future use by this specification.

  • 🇳🇱Netherlands bbrala Netherlands
  • 🇳🇱Netherlands bbrala Netherlands
  • 🇳🇱Netherlands bbrala Netherlands

    Fancy filters: This would be an refinement of the filter parameter, therfor a profile.
    Partial success: This is harder, is this an extention? If so this data could be added (while scoped by extention key) to the document. You could also say its an profile, it just adds some new information to another 'loosely defined' part of the document, therefor doesn't really rewrite the spec.

Production build 0.71.5 2024