Hi I had a question and possibly some feedback for this fix.
We have ran into this issue on a site at our institution. In our situation we have a View Block that uses the the "Content: Published status or admin user" filter and we have the View Unpublished modules installed and enabled. What we have notices is after updating to Drupal 10.3.5 content editors, lost the ability the view the View Block as logged in users, however non authenticated user could see the content. We discover that removing filter and en adding it fixed the issue.
Additionally, we ran another test using the patch provided in this post. The patch did change the UI elements indicating that the filter would not have an effect, however the content did not present. It wasn't until we removed the "Content Published status or admin user" filter and re add it did the content get presented as normal.
My questions:
- If the patch is to remove the additional Criteria on the queuery, why after apply the patch does the content not show up?
- Why does the content show up after I remove and re add the filter?
nathanhealea → created an issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
@scott_euser,
I was able to resolve the issue by uninstall the reinstall the footnote module.
Thanks for the assistances.
@scoot_euser,
What config/install are you referencing to. Is there one in the footnote module that was delete? I looked at the module in my conrib directory and id not see and config/install directory.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
Hey @scott_euser
That did work!! Thank you for all the help.
I would suggest an update to the documentation to call out that you have to have CK5 and Footnotes@^4 installed and enabled before running the commands.
After you gave me the suggestion to use `paragraph` I did not have CKEditor 5 enabled and I lost my footnotes. After restoring my environment and enabling CK5 with Footnotes, then running the commands it worked.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
@scott_euser,
I can confirm that it is in a nested fiends for the node entity types are in a nested field (paragraphs).
Certainly I can open a new issues for the blocks issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.
nathanhealea → created an issue.